Hi Sven, On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 07:54:20PM +0200, Sven Panne wrote: > Is there a deep reason why the ghc/rts packages have various > files/directories > directly below the GHC installation directory?
No. > A cleaner way would be having > them below "lib/ghc" and "lib/rts", just like the other packages If we build them with Cabal in the next major release then we'll get this for free. > (Perhaps > with a version suffix? If yes, which one?). The GHC version probably makes most sense. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
