duncan.coutts: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 08:50 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > > > > Don, what do you think? How about we keep bytestring on darcs.h.o and > > > only move binary etc to code.h.o. > > > > As long as we have a head and stable branch. I don't want to validate > > any time we make a change to bytestring, only when merging. > > Ok, fixed. > > darcs.haskell.org/bytestring is the HEAD > darcs.haskell.org/packages/bytestring is ghc-HEAD's copy > darcs.haskell.org/ghc-6.8/packages/bytestring is ghc-6.8's copy > > These are all independent copies. This mirrors the layout for Cabal. > > You can push to bytestring HEAD without validating. > > you must validate with the appropriate ghc when copying patches from > bytestring HEAD to one of ghc's bytestring branches. > > > code.haskell.org/bytestring has a MOTD telling people to ignore it and > use darcs.haskell.org/bytestring instead.
Great Duncan. Thanks for taking care of this. -- Don _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
