On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:16:35PM -0000, Claus Reinke wrote: > >>>>but i tend to use 'darcs send -o file' so > >>>>that i can (a) add comments, > >>>darcs send --edit-description > >> > >>that will edit the patch description. apart from that getting > >>burried in the email attachment, > > > >No, it edits the patch *bundle* description, which is the body of the > >e-mail, not in the attachment. > > despite rumours to the contrary,-) the patch bundle description, > while different from the patch description, is not the body of > the email. as demonstrated by the patch i just sent, both are > included in the email attachment, leaving an empty body.
Ah, yes, a darcs bug I'd forgotten about (at least, I assume the problem is that darcs is talking MAPI incorrectly) means that the whole MIME message ends up being put in an attachment when "darcs send"ing from a Windows machine. If anyone knows MAPI then I hope it would be easy to fix it. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
