>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Haddock options in source files can look either like this:
>>>
>>> -- # prune, hide, etc
>>>
>>> Or like this:
>>>
>>> {-# prune, hide, etc #-}
>>>
>>> Since the second one was hard to support in GHC, and because I wanted
>>> to
>>> implement something that fit better with the GHC system of
>>> options/pragmas, I implemented support for Haddock options solely
>>> through
>>> a new pragma: {-# DOC_OPTIONS #-}.
>>>
>>> My question is: Do you like this change and should we update packages
>>> to
>>> support it, or should we also support the "-- #" style options for
>>> backwards-compatibility?
>>
>> Sorry, with "also support the -- # style options" I mean to add support
>> for them to GHC's lexer so that Haddock 2.0 supports them as well. They
>> should of course never be removed from the source files.
>
> We took this discussion over IRC, and concluded that DOC_OPTIONS should be
> renamed to HADDOCK_OPTIONS...Sorry, that should be OPTIONS_HADDOCK. David _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
