On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:34:30AM +0100, David Waern wrote: > You are right, it's not the most modular solution. Nevertheless, we now > have the ability to generate documentation from all kinds of GHC-specific > source code - pretty cool. > > Out of curiosity: Do you have a better solution for Haddock, if the > requirement is to be able to understand GHC-specific code? Perhaps one > could avoid having to modify the parser, and instead try to match > Haddock-comments/declarations by their SrcLocs. > > Or perhaps your ideal solution would be something not involving GHC? :-)
No, I don't have a better idea. I just have a bad feeling about the current approach... Stefan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
