I have no clue what the darcs bug is. I thought the testsuite had no conflicts,
and hence would not get "commuting_patch" errors.
However, to get you un-wedged I've put an update-to-date tarball of the
testsuite at
http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/downloads/testsuite.tar.gz
If you untar that, replacing your current testsuite repo, you should be good to
go.
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Norman Ramsey
| Sent: 01 May 2008 21:03
| To: [email protected]
| Subject: trouble getting repo up to date
|
| I'm trying to get my copy of the head up to date,
| and I'm tripping over a bug in darcs:
|
| : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9937 ; ./darcs-all pull -av
| == running darcs pull -av
| Pulling from "http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc";...
| This is the GHC darcs repository (HEAD branch)
|
| For more information, visit the GHC developer wiki at
| http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc
| **********************
| We have the following new (to them) patches:
| They have the following patches to pull:
| No remote changes to pull in!
| == nofib not present or not a repository; skipping
| == running darcs pull -av --repodir testsuite
| Pulling from "http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc";...
| This is the GHC darcs repository (HEAD branch)
|
| For more information, visit the GHC developer wiki at
| http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc
| **********************
| darcs: bug in get_extra commuting patch:
| Fri Sep 7 04:23:27 EDT 2001 simonmar
| * [project @ 2001-09-07 08:23:27 by simonmar]
| Fix some signatures after Ord was removed as a superclass of Ix.
| darcs failed: 256 at ./darcs-all line 59.
| : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9939 ;
|
| Can anyone suggest how I should proceed at this point?
|
|
| Norman
|
| _______________________________________________
| Cvs-ghc mailing list
| [email protected]
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
