On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 11:18 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote: > In this case, I was told that base3-compat was provided > explicitly to avoid breakage[1], and as I reported, that > doesn't seem to be the case [2].
You're right, it should work with base-3. > [2] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2008-August/044510.html Duncan _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
