| I'm sorry to ask this, but are you sure to have an un-modified repository?

I am absolutely 100% certain that *I* made no changes. But darcs must have! Here is what 'darcs what' says:

cd libraries/Cabal/
bash-3.2$ darcs what -ls
./Distribution/PackageDescription.hs -> 
./Distribution/PackageDescription/Types.hs
./Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs -> 
./Distribution/PackageDescription/QA.hs
./tests/UnitTest/Distribution/Simple/PreProcess/UnlitTest.hs -> 
./tests/UnlitTest.hs
A ./Distribution/PackageDescription.hs
A ./Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs
R ./Distribution/PackageDescription/QA.hs
R ./Distribution/PackageDescription/Types.hs
A ./tests/UnitTest/Distribution/Simple/PreProcess/UnlitTest.hs
R ./tests/UnlitTest.hs
a ./doc/Cabal.xml.~1~
bash-3.2$

I notice that this bogus whatsnew report looks very similar to the bogus
pending attached to http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1034 . Afaik, this hasn't
been reproduced yet (well, not in a bug-tracking sense, though certainly
in a bug sense).

But note that the direction of moves is wrong (inverted):

Mon Feb 11 00:38:30 GMT Standard Time 2008  Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 * Unify sanity and other checks and separate IO checks
 And rename from QA so we no longer pretend to assure anything :-)
 We now distinguish different kinds of tests with a PackageCheck type so the
 caller gets to decide which kinds of checks are relevant to the context.
 This PackageCheck type should be extensible if we want to add more kinds or
 more info besides a brief human readable explanation.

    ./Distribution/PackageDescription/QA.hs -> 
./Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs
   M ./Cabal.cabal -1 +1
   M ./Distribution/PackageDescription/Check.hs -186 +199
   M ./Distribution/Simple/Configure.hs -20 +14
   M ./Distribution/Simple/SrcDist.hs -14 +21

If the example can't be reproduced for debugging, perhaps this
reversing of moves can be explained from darcs sources?

Claus

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to