On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 09:38:07 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
I don't understand? Simon's report starts with 'More darcs2 woe', darcs2 came out in 2008, issue494 claims to have been resolved by a patch in August 2007. How can a patch from a year ago solve an issue in a version of darcs that should already include that patch in the first place?
|Because Simon's working directory changes were from his darcs 1.0.9 days.
I must have missed that info. |He says it's an old repository that he's pulling from. He says it is an old repository that he's pulling into, hence lots of patches to pull. But the list of patches doesn't include the renaming that is reported the wrong way round in whatsnew, so it might be that pending was screwed up while he was using an earlier darcs version. All ghc repos are old, though, and have been handled by some version of darcs 1 at some point or other, including the repos involved in issue1034. And since darcs does not preserve information about screwups (issue1010), and users don't ask whatsnew in repos they don't work in, there is no telling whether the issues are old or new. Claus _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
