On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:55:11AM +0000, Max Bolingbroke wrote:
> Ah, sorry Manuel! I am indeed guilty of not running validate - the
> reason is that I have /never/ been able to validate GHC cleanly. The
> latest problem is that there appear to be Haddock errors in the source
> code, and validate just bombs out when Haddock reports documentation
> generation failure - does anyone know how to fix this?

Can you send the output of running validate please?
This should put it in a file called "log":

    sh validate 2>&1 | tee log


Thanks
Ian

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to