| > good point. Could we call them 'tags-emacs' and 'tags-vim'? | | We could do, but tags and TAGS are the standard names. | | We could also have separate "make tags" and "make TAGS" commands, which | generate only the named file. | | Whatever the decision, implementing it will be easy. |
Does it matter whether it's standard? Esp if the standard doesn't work on Windows and MacOS. The file names are self-describing, and the 'make' target could emit a message to say what the outputs are called. It'd be good to decide one way or t'other and clear it away. Does anyone else care? (This can't be a new problem.) S _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
