On 11/04/2011 11:18, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Simon Marlow:
While it would be really nice to have an easy way to create public
forks for the whole GHC tree, we didn't have that with darcs
either, so we haven't lost anything. In due course we can look
into submodules or other ways of achieving this.
Sure, nothing is lost, but it be nice to offset the hassle of
switching. GitHub is to me one of the most attractive aspects of
Git. Are there any other ways of achieving this?
There's also subtree merging or git-subtree, see
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2011-January/059328.html
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
