| > So I'd like to ask you if you'd be OK with this plan? You would all | > need kill your local haddock2 clones and create new clones.
I'm ok with this. You're correct that the ghc-generics branch is now dead, ditto ghc-new-co. | > To stop the two repos from diverging again we could either kill the | > darcs repo or forbid comitting directly to the git repo. | | In the darcs days, the two were intentionally diverging as the upstream | repo was supporting the last stable GHC release, whereas the GHC HEAD | repo needed to work with HEAD. How are we going to handle that now? Presumably the same way as we do the libraries -- by branching at the same time as we branch HEAD? Simon _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
