Each of these repositories has a "type-nats" branch in it, which is where my 
changes reside.  Before we go on with the discussion of what/how to merge into 
the master branch, would it be OK to move my "type-nats" branch into the 
central GHC repo on darcs.haskell.org<http://darcs.haskell.org> so that it is 
easier for people to access it.  (Having it in the central repo is a bit easier 
because one would not have to much around with multiple "remotes".)

Yes I think so.  Just make a type-nats branch in each of the three repos.  
Thanks.

Simon

From: Iavor Diatchki [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 20 June 2011 21:42
To: Simon Peyton-Jones
Cc: Adam Gundry; Dimitrios Vytiniotis; [email protected]; Conor McBride; 
Stephanie Weirich
Subject: Re: Type-level natural numbers

Hello again,

Over the weekend I merged my changes with the current "master" branch (up to 
and including the "safe haskell" extensions).  Currently, the code is on  one 
of the machines at Galois, and can be obtained with the following commands:

git clone 
git://code.galois.com/type-naturals/ghc.git<http://code.galois.com/type-naturals/ghc.git>
git clone 
git://code.galois.com/type-naturals/base.git<http://code.galois.com/type-naturals/base.git>
git clone 
git://code.galois.com/type-naturals/template-haskell.git<http://code.galois.com/type-naturals/template-haskell.git>

Each of these repositories has a "type-nats" branch in it, which is where my 
changes reside.  Before we go on with the discussion of what/how to merge into 
the master branch, would it be OK to move my "type-nats" branch into the 
central GHC repo on darcs.haskell.org<http://darcs.haskell.org> so that it is 
easier for people to access it.  (Having it in the central repo is a bit easier 
because one would not have to much around with multiple "remotes".)

-Iavor

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to