[Last night's post got filtered so I am breaking it up - apologies if you
get the original.]
CONTEXT: I was trying to verify a non-bindist installation by running the
testsuite on the target but neglected to match up the build gcc and
installation gcc leading to stange cc1 failures. (I can't use a bindist
distribution.)
I have now matched up the build and installation gcc and things are looking
up. For WAY=optc I get the following:
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sun Sep 11 18:45:07 BST 2011
2612 total tests, which gave rise to
14419 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failures
13106 were skipped
1280 expected passes
22 expected failures
0 unexpected passes
11 unexpected failures
Unexpected failures:
4038(optc)
Chan001(optc)
MVar001(optc)
QSem001(optc)
QSemN001(optc)
SampleVar001(optc)
T3087(optc)
cgrun025(optc)
maessen_hashtab(optc)
regex003(optc)
space_leak_001(optc)
I think I am only approximating the build environment by using 2011.2.0.1.
Here is a breakdown in the failures.
* 5 of the tests (Chan-001-->SampleVar001) fail to find
Debug.QuickCheck
* a further 3 static failures (T3087, maessen_hashtab & regex003)
* cgrun025 bombs out with an irrefutable pattern failure
* 4038 fails to provide any output
* I couldn't see what was wrong with space_leak_001
The testsuite appears to almost work standalone. Is it intended to? Or
should I place it in the source tree to test the installation?
Thanks!
Chris
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
