cvsuser     03/12/03 08:17:42

  Modified:    App-Context/lib/App faq.pod
  Log:
  rough update
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.3       +28 -27    p5ee/App-Context/lib/App/faq.pod
  
  Index: faq.pod
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /cvs/public/p5ee/App-Context/lib/App/faq.pod,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  diff -u -w -r1.2 -r1.3
  --- faq.pod   1 Nov 2002 20:18:22 -0000       1.2
  +++ faq.pod   3 Dec 2003 16:17:42 -0000       1.3
  @@ -6,12 +6,13 @@
   
   =head1 NAME
   
  -App::faq - App Frequently Asked Questions
  +App::faq - App-Context Frequently Asked Questions
   
   =head1 INTRODUCTION
   
   This is the FAQ for the
  -App (Perl 5 Enterprise Environment).
  +App-Context software framework
  +(a variant of the Perl 5 Enterprise Environment).
   You can find out more background to the project on the web.
   
     http://www.officevision.com/pub/p5ee
  @@ -19,7 +20,7 @@
   
   =head1 GENERAL
   
  -=head2 Why should I use App rather than J2EE or .NET?
  +=head2 Why should I use App-Context rather than J2EE or .NET?
   
   Perhaps it's because you prefer writing in Perl?
   But besides that, there are other reasons.
  @@ -60,20 +61,20 @@
   a blueprint for large-scale development and deployment of 
   high-performance, high-availability systems (i.e. enterprise 
   systems) along with guides of discipline for coding and 
  -documentation.  The App fills this gap.
  +documentation.  The App-Context framework fills this gap.
   
  -So that's the explanation of "why App?"
  +So that's the explanation of "why App-Context?"
   
  -For an explanation of "why not App?" you might consider that it
  +For an explanation of "why not App-Context?" you might consider that it
   is still largely vaporware.
   
  -=head2 How well does the App fit into a .NET technical strategy?
  +=head2 How well does the App-Context fit into a .NET technical strategy?
   
  -It may seem that App is most at home with the following technologies.
  +It may seem that App-Context is most at home with the following technologies.
   
     * Perl, Linux, Apache, CGI, and MySQL.
   
  -However, the App abstracts much of the 
  +However, the App-Context framework abstracts much of the 
   runtime environment, so that it is just as easy to use:
   
     * Perl, Windows NT, IIS, ISAPI, and SQLServer.
  @@ -96,20 +97,20 @@
       to run on the .NET CLR.
       http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/
   
  -=head2 What is the relation between App and mod_perl?
  +=head2 What is the relation between App-Context and mod_perl?
   
   The people who have been developing and working on mod_perl have done
   an incredible service to Enterprise Perl in general, and therefore
  -the App in particular.  Other efforts that dramatically enhance
  +the App-Context in particular.  Other efforts that dramatically enhance
   Enterprise Perl are SOAP projects, XML projects, DBD/DBI::*,
   Templating projects, etc.  These are all making dramatic contributions,
   and they need not change anything they are doing in order to continue
   to do so.
   
  -On the contrary, the responsibility is on the designers of the App
  +On the contrary, the responsibility is on the designers of the App-Context
   to accommodate and incorporate these many enterprise-class technologies
  -into an integrates whole.  Browse the classes envisioned for App
  -by App to see one way that these might fit together.  Take
  +into an integrates whole.  Browse the classes envisioned for App-Context
  +to see one way that these might fit together.  Take
   special note of the "Classes (Planned)" at the bottom of the 
   "All Classes" frame.
   
  @@ -121,23 +122,23 @@
     http://www.officevision.com/pub/p5ee/software/htdocs/Appx/Blue/Context.html
   
   There is no need for the mod_perl project to explicitly 
  -integrate with App.  However, in the spirit of community, 
  -as the App grows in its capabilities, I would imagine a 
  -natural cross-fertilization of ideas would occur so that if App needed
  +integrate with App-Context.  However, in the spirit of community, 
  +as the App-Context grows in its capabilities, I would imagine a 
  +natural cross-fertilization of ideas would occur so that if App-Context needed
   any specific feature in mod_perl it would be implemented without
   too much trouble.
   
  -However, App reaches further than just running in a mod_perl Context.
  -App is equipped with (when they are written, of course) a variety of 
  -Context classes which allow App software to run in many other Contexts 
  +However, App-Context reaches further than just running in a mod_perl Context.
  +App-Context is equipped with (when they are written, of course) a variety of 
  +Context classes which allow App-Context software to run in many other Contexts 
   besides mod_perl.
   
  -=head2 What does it mean for App to support Perl 5.5.3 if some of its components 
require a higher version of Perl?
  +=head2 What does it mean for App-Context to support Perl 5.5.3 if some of its 
components require a higher version of Perl?
   
  -The App (as envisioned in App) is like a software backplane
  +The App-Context is like a software backplane
   for many services required by an enterprise application.  Into that
  -backplane plug the App Services.  There may be many implementations
  -of each of the App Services, making for an almost limitless array
  +backplane plug the App-Context Services.  There may be many implementations
  +of each of the App-Context Services, making for an almost limitless array
   of possible combinations.  (Hopefully, favorites will emerge.)
   
   The Context is a Core Service, like Session and Config.
  @@ -148,7 +149,7 @@
   the implementer may choose to deploy the software, and the software
   could reasonably run on all of them.  The fact that (the envisioned)
   App::Context::Modperl2 depends on 5.6.0 does not invalidate
  -the fact that the App depends only on 5.5.3.  Implementers who
  +the fact that the App-Context depends only on 5.5.3.  Implementers who
   choose to deploy with Services that have higher Perl version 
   dependencies must of course satisfy those dependencies.
   
  @@ -171,9 +172,9 @@
   big budget projects with the latest new hardware.  My experience 
   with customers who are large enterprises is that they have an 
   incredible mish-mash of systems and legacy environments.  I envision 
  -that App software could be installed on every platform they own 
  +that App-Context software could be installed on every platform they own 
   (isn't Perl almost the most-ported language on the planet?).  
  -That is why I believe that App must support 5.5.3 (or perhaps 
  +That is why I believe that App-Context must support 5.5.3 (or perhaps 
   earlier, but I won't go there yet until I see a real need to
   and understand exactly what I would be giving up).
   
  
  
  

Reply via email to