Author: jkeenan
Date: Sat Jan  3 19:44:41 2009
New Revision: 34907

Modified:
   trunk/t/tools/ops2pm/04-prepare_ops.t

Log:
Change TODO heading in POD to COMMENT and explain why we don't really need to 
do what TODO was suggesting.

Modified: trunk/t/tools/ops2pm/04-prepare_ops.t
==============================================================================
--- trunk/t/tools/ops2pm/04-prepare_ops.t       (original)
+++ trunk/t/tools/ops2pm/04-prepare_ops.t       Sat Jan  3 19:44:41 2009
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
 F<04-prepare_ops.t> tests whether C<Parrot::Ops2pm::Base::prepare_ops()>
 works properly.
 
-=head1 TODO
+=head1 COMMENT
 
 The following statements and branches in C<prepare_ops()> are as yet uncovered:
 
@@ -270,6 +270,10 @@
     die "$self->{script}: Could not read ops file '$self->{file}'!\n"
         unless defined $ops;
 
+Probably not, because the existence of C<$self->{file} has already been
+checked.  But it never hurts to check whether a constructor has returned a
+defined value.
+
 =item *
 
 Can I provoke this C<die> message?
@@ -278,6 +282,8 @@
         die "$self->{script}: Could not read ops file '$f'!\n"
             unless defined $temp_ops;
 
+Probably not, for same reason as above.
+
 =back
 
 =head1 AUTHOR

Reply via email to