Alan Greenspan Was Right: Translation of GreenSpeaks Into Plain English
 
Common Misconceptions About The Recent Crisis:
 
 The Root of the Financial Rout is Systemic:
 
 which means that the problem comes from the system itself and not from one of 
its part.
 
The sub-prime rout is only one symptom of the problem. 
 
  How do we know?
 
 Because it is not a few financial institutions that have been plagued it is 
the whole financial system. So the root has to be global.
 
 We will find the cause when we observe the chart of long-term rates.
 
 Chart of the 30 years US Treasury Bonds from 1977 to Present.
 
 We can see that for instance the rate of the 30 years US Treasury Bond went 
from 14.50% in 1981 to 4.30% lately and this in a constant decrease.
 
 The global acceleration of that phenomenon was termed Greenspan Conundrum:
 
   "The favorable inflation performance across a broad range of countries 
resulting from enlarged global goods, 
 services and financial capacity has doubtless contributed to expectations of 
 lower inflation in the years ahead and lower inflation risk premiums. 
 
But none of this is new and hence it is difficult to attribute the long-term 
interest rate 
 declines of the last nine months to glacially increasing globalization. For 
the moment,
 the broadly unanticipated behavior of world bond markets remains a conundrum. 
 Bond price movements may be a short-term aberration, 
 but it will be some time before we are able to better judge the forces 
underlying recent experience."
 
Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
 Federal Reserve Board's semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress
 Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate
 February 16, 2005
 
 "Considerable debate remains among analysts as to the nature of those market 
forces. 
 
 "Whatever those forces are, they are surely global, because the decline in 
long-term interest rates in the past year 
 is even more pronounced in major foreign financial markets than in the United 
States."
 
Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
 Federal Reserve Board's semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress
 Before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives
 July 20, 2005
 
 1776-Annuit Cœptis researches discovered that a normal curve would compensate 
exactly the owner of an asset for his interest risk. There is Market 
indifference between short-term and long-term asset. The monetary policy is 
neutral.
 
 If the curve is steeper the yield-curve is steep and Market prefers long-term 
assets. The monetary policy is accommodating.
 
 If the slope is less steep or even negative the yield-curve is said to be 
inverted and Market prefers short term assets. The monetary policy is 
restrictive.
 
 When the yield curve of market indifference goes through 0% for overnight 
loans the Market reaches what is known as Keynes' Liquidity Trap. It is 
according to 1776-Annuit Cœptis  research the root of the Great Depression and 
to a lesser extent the cause of the Japanese Lost Decade [which is now 15 years 
old].
 
 When the FED [Chairman Sir Alan "The Maestro" Greenspan] saw the long-term 
yield going down they tried what they could to avoid the Ominous Keynes' 
Liquidity Trap.
 
 They hence shoot up the short-term rates from 1.00% to 5.25% with the hope of 
pumping up long-term rates.
 .
 However these long-term rates went up a mere 1.00%.
 
 The yield-curve became inverted so financial institutions not being 
compensated for the interest rate risk had no interest to finance investments.
 
 Graph of the Current Yield Curve.
 
 They found out that mortgage was a good alternative. But as it was the case 
for Junk Bonds in the 80's the huge liquidities in the bank needed a 
commensurate demand which explains why the sub-prime mess started.
 
 They should have withdrawn from long-term investments instead they started 
fantasy investing.
 
  Contrary to Common Belief
 is High Short Fed Funds Rather Than Low Fed Funds 
 That Caused the Sub-Prime Disaster. 
 
But why do long-term yields do go down?
 
  "New Forces" that were not yet understood were likely behind the unusual 
environment of low long-term interest rates around the world, he said. "I do 
think the most relevant likely reason why we are dealing with what we are 
dealing with are new forces ... in the international market," Greenspan said 
via satellite from Washington. 
 "Their nature and their behaviour is not something we are going to fully 
understand, if ever; 
 certainly except in retrospect."
 
 Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
 Central Bank Panel Discussion
 To the International Monetary Conference,
 Beijing, People's Republic of China (via satellite)
 June 6, 2005 

 Obviously if someone knows that something will be understood he does 
necessarly already understand it.
 
In retrospect after what? the Keynes' Liquidity Trap?
 
These new forces are the increase of the income and wealth disparities.
 
 When the revenue of the poor go down by $1 it takes out $1 out of the demand 
for good and services. The poor is said to have a high propensity (close to 1) 
to consume.
 
 When the revenue of the rich goes up by $1 he saves $1. The rich is said to 
have a high propensity to save.
 
 So more and more dollars go to more ad more investments which have lower and 
lower revenues and profit. Their yield go down.
 
   Interest Rates are the Cause and Consequence of 
 the Explosion of Income Disparities and 
 the Instability of the System 
 
  "The income gap between the rich and the rest of the US population has become 
so wide,
 and is growing so fast, that it might eventually threaten the stability of 
democratic capitalism itself."
 
 Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
  
 Conclusion:
 
As a consequence any "solution" that wouldn't address the issue of distribution 
of income and wealth in a extensive way would be doomed on the short-run and 
any body that would have vested interest in the wealthy have no chance to come 
up with a solution.
 
 Any "solution" that would not cancel the notion of credit is doomed on the 
long-run and any body who have vested interest in the financial institutions 
have no chance to come up with a long-term solution.
 
  DIE ZEIT: Can the right monetary and fiscal policy keep the US out of a 
recession?
 
 Alan Greenspan: 
 
"Probably not. Global forces can now override most anything that monetary and 
fiscal policy can do. Long-term real interest rates have significantly more 
impact on the core of economic activity than the individual actions of nations. 
Central banks have increasingly lost their capacity to influence the longer end 
of the market. Two to three decades, ago central banks were dominant throughout 
the maturity schedule. 
 Thus, the more important question is the direction of long-term real interest 
rates." 
 
Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
 The Great Irony of Success
 © ZEIT online, 30.1.2008 
 
 The last global bailout of the banks which insure interbank loans will not 
solve the problem:
  
 
 "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex and more violent. 
 It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage to move in the opposite 
direction."
 
 Albert Einstein
 
  Banks will prefer to loan one another with insurance from governments and 
will even less be willing to lend to investors and consumers. There will be a 
massive increase of interbank supply. There will be a total disconnection 
between the financial market and the demand for investments. Interbank interest 
rates and treasury yields will go down dramatically.
 
 Interest will be going down and the fast decreasing amount of new saving 
vehicles will create the largest and shortest asset price bubble ever a 
gigantic wave of irrational exuberance [Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" 
Greenspan] or saving glut [Ben Bernanke] a massive capital accumulation [Karl 
Marx].
 
Not only will the price of good assets go up, but the price most risky of them 
will go up even more: according to the model of 1776-Annuit Cœptis the credit 
spreads, will go down to zero hours before the crash. 
 
  "Whether the currently elevated level of the wealth-to-income ratio will be 
sustained in the longer run remains to be seen. But arguably, the growing 
stability of the world economy over the past decade may have encouraged 
investors to accept increasingly lower levels of compensation for risk. They 
are exhibiting a seeming willingness to project stability and commit over an 
ever more extended time horizon.
 
 The lowered risk premiums--the apparent consequence of a long period of 
economic stability--coupled with greater productivity growth have propelled 
asset prices higher. The rising prices of stocks, bonds and, more recently, of 
homes, have engendered a large increase in the market value of claims which, 
when converted to cash, are a source of purchasing power. Financial 
intermediaries, of course, routinely convert capital gains in stocks, bonds, 
and homes into cash for businesses and households to facilitate purchase 
transactions. The conversions have been markedly facilitated by the
 financial innovation that has greatly reduced the cost of such transactions.
 
 Thus, this vast increase in the market value of asset claims is in part the 
indirect result of investors accepting lower compensation for risk. Such an 
increase in market value is too often viewed by market participants as 
structural and permanent. To some extent, those higher values may be reflecting 
the increased flexibility and resilience of our economy. But what they perceive 
as newly abundant liquidity can readily disappear. Any onset of increased 
investor caution elevates risk premiums and, as a consequence, lowers asset 
values and promotes the liquidation of the debt that supported higher asset 
prices. This is the reason that history has not dealt kindly with the aftermath 
of protracted periods of low risk premiums."
 
 Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
 Reflections on Central Banking
 At a symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City,
 Jackson Hole, Wyoming
 August 26, 2005
 
  The asset price bubble and the lack of new investment will increase even more 
the income and wealth gap between the rich and the poor.
 
The long-term interest rates will be also necessarily lower as mortgages will 
not any more be an investment grade asset.
 
This dramatic fall of long-term interest rates will probably cause the 
yield-curve to be inverted.
 
1776-Annuit Cœptis has proved that it is the cause of the commodities bubble. 
 
That coupled with the high level of unused liquidities will create a gigantic 
commodity bubble.
 
That bubble will cause an even bigger increase in the income/wealth disparities 
with probable food crisis.
 
The central banks confronted with that "inflation" will increase their 
short-term rates and increase the inversion of the yield-curve.
 
Swamped with liquidities and confronted with an inverted yield-curve banks 
collectively will most probably do something idiot again.
 
Most probably and because the Keynes' Liquidity Trap occurs at a minimum of 
long-term interest rates at that time the stock market will be at an all time 
high. 
 
The fall will be dramatic and ugly with no prior warning.
 
The solutions offered by governments will not solve the problem neither 
short-term nor long-term it will in fact accelerate the fall in Keynes 
Liquidity Trap.
 
  "At the present moment people are unusually expectant of a more fundamental 
diagnosis;
 more particularly ready to receive it; eager to try it out, if it should be 
even plausible.
 
 But apart from this contemporary mood, the ideas of economists and political 
philosophers,
 both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is 
commonly understood.
 
 Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe 
themselves to be quite 
 exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some 
defunct economist.
 
 Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy
 from some academic scribbler of a few years back. Emperors and armies come and 
go;
 but unless they leave new ideas in their wake, they are of passing historic 
consequence. 
 
 I am sure that the power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared 
with the 
 gradual encroachment of ideas. Not, indeed, immediately, but after a certain 
interval; 
 
 for in the field of economic and political philosophy there are not many who 
are influenced by new theories 
 after they are twenty-five or thirty years of age, so that the ideas which 
civil servants 
 and politicians and even agitators apply to current events are not likely to 
be the newest.
 
 But, soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for 
good or evil."
 
 John Maynard Keynes, 
  The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, 
 13 December 1935, p. 383.
 Quoted by Chairman Sir Alan "El Maestro" Greenspan
 Adam Smith
 At the Adam Smith Memorial Lecture, Kirkcaldy, Scotland
 February 6, 2005 

 Now you know something Chairman Ben S. Bernanke "is not going to fully 
understand, if ever; certainly except in retrospect.".
 
Given the vested interests and inability of those who govern us to offer a 
credible solution to the serious problem affecting the world, 1776-Annuit 
Cœptis is forced to assume the responsibilities of these incapable and propose 
to those who demonstrate the desire a just and efficient solution which without 
avoiding the economic and financial disaster, will protect its shareholders 
from all of its ominous consequences.
 
  Get Ready for the Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World 

Read the Free Market, Credit Free Proposal of 1776-Annuit Cœptis  
 Alea Jacta Est 
 1 7 7 6 Annuit Coœptis believes that it won't have time to contact you again 
till it declares the state of systemic economic catastrophe. However please 
read our Strict Direct Contacts Policy
 
 Reproduction of all or part of this document is granted to anybody 
 under the strict condition that the address of the site: http://www.17-76.net/ 
 and the name 1776-Annuit Cœptis appear proeminently on the document.

Reply via email to