User: jpmcc Date: 2009-01-19 07:31:38+0000 Modified: native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml native-lang/www/planet/index.html native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Mon Jan 19 07:31:25 GMT 2009 File Changes: Directory: /native-lang/www/planet/ =================================== File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1199&r2=1.1200 Delta lines: +42 -15 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-01-18 00:00:56+0000 1.1199 +++ atom.xml 2009-01-19 07:31:35+0000 1.1200 @@ -5,9 +5,36 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:51+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T07:31:29+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> + <entry> + <title type="html">My first day af my first LotusPhere</title> + <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html"/> + <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130</id> + <updated>2009-01-18T22:47:28+00:00</updated> + <content type="html">Ok. Here I am. + +LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida! + +This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison? + +Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</content> + <author> + <name>Leif Lodahl</name> + <email>[email protected]</email> + <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title> + <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark. +Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> + <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:42+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry xml:lang="en"> <title type="html">United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</title> <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/"/> @@ -18,7 +45,7 @@ <p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> <ul> <li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to what kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> +<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> </li> <li> <p>Michael makes all those claims and that&#8217;s his right to do so but -and that&#8217;s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> @@ -44,7 +71,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:47+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-18T18:00:34+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -71,7 +98,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:51+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:42+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -99,7 +126,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Histoires OpenOfficiennes et autres...</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://sophiegautier.com/blog/atom.php"/> <id>tag:sophiegautier.com,2009:/blog/index.php/</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:48+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -137,7 +164,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:47+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-18T18:00:34+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -174,7 +201,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:47+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-18T18:00:34+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -201,7 +228,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Histoires OpenOfficiennes et autres...</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://sophiegautier.com/blog/atom.php"/> <id>tag:sophiegautier.com,2009:/blog/index.php/</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:48+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -232,7 +259,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Histoires OpenOfficiennes et autres...</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://sophiegautier.com/blog/atom.php"/> <id>tag:sophiegautier.com,2009:/blog/index.php/</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:48+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -261,7 +288,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Ichinoseki, Iwate, Japan</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/atom.xml"/> <id>http://openoffice.exblog.jp/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:50+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T07:31:29+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -285,7 +312,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:51+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:42+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -304,7 +331,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Histoires OpenOfficiennes et autres...</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://sophiegautier.com/blog/atom.php"/> <id>tag:sophiegautier.com,2009:/blog/index.php/</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:48+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -329,7 +356,7 @@ <subtitle type="html">Histoires OpenOfficiennes et autres...</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://sophiegautier.com/blog/atom.php"/> <id>tag:sophiegautier.com,2009:/blog/index.php/</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:48+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:36+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -348,7 +375,7 @@ <title type="html">andreasma_at_ooo</title> <link rel="self" href="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss"/> <id>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss</id> - <updated>2009-01-17T18:00:49+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T06:00:24+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -369,7 +396,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T00:00:51+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-01-19T00:00:42+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1199&r2=1.1200 Delta lines: +23 -2 -------------------- --- index.html 2009-01-18 00:00:56+0000 1.1199 +++ index.html 2009-01-19 07:31:35+0000 1.1200 @@ -28,8 +28,29 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: January 18, 2009 12:00 AM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: January 19, 2009 07:31 AM GMT</em></p> +<h2>January 18, 2009</h2> +<h3> +<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog"> +Leif Lodahl</a> : +<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html";> +My first day af my first LotusPhere</a> +</h3> +<p> +Ok. Here I am. + +LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida! + +This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison? + +Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html";>by Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at January 18, 2009 10:47 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>January 17, 2009</h2> <h3> <a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> @@ -43,7 +64,7 @@ <p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> <ul> <li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to what kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we’re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> +<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we’re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> </li> <li> <p>Michael makes all those claims and that’s his right to do so but -and that’s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1199&r2=1.1200 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-01-18 00:00:56+0000 1.1199 +++ opml.xml 2009-01-19 07:31:35+0000 1.1200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Native Language Confederation Planet</title> - <dateModified>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:00:51 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:31:30 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Native Language Confederation</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.251&r2=1.252 Delta lines: +15 -1 -------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-01-18 00:00:56+0000 1.251 +++ rss10.xml 2009-01-19 07:31:35+0000 1.252 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8338255612344603251" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:sophiegautier.com,2009-01-08:/blog/99" /> @@ -30,6 +31,19 @@ </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130"> + <title>Leif Lodahl: My first day af my first LotusPhere</title> + <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html</link> + <content:encoded>Ok. Here I am. + +LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida! + +This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison? + +Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-01-18T22:47:28+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> +</item> <item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/";> <title>Charles Schulz: United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</title> <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</link> @@ -38,7 +52,7 @@ <p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> <ul> <li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to what kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> +<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> </li> <li> <p>Michael makes all those claims and that&#8217;s his right to do so but -and that&#8217;s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.252&r2=1.253 Delta lines: +15 -1 -------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-01-18 00:00:56+0000 1.252 +++ rss20.xml 2009-01-19 07:31:35+0000 1.253 @@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ <description>Native Language Confederation Planet - http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>Leif Lodahl: My first day af my first LotusPhere</title> + <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130</guid> + <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html</link> + <description>Ok. Here I am. + +LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida! + +This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison? + +Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</description> + <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate> + <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> +</item> +<item> <title>Charles Schulz: United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</title> <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</guid> <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</link> @@ -16,7 +30,7 @@ <p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> <ul> <li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to what kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> +<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> </li> <li> <p>Michael makes all those claims and that&#8217;s his right to do so but -and that&#8217;s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
