User: jpmcc Date: 2009-02-20 00:01:05+0000 Modified: native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml native-lang/www/planet/index.html native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Fri Feb 20 00:00:31 GMT 2009 File Changes: Directory: /native-lang/www/planet/ =================================== File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.1325&r2=1.1326 Delta lines: +27 -88 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2009-02-19 18:01:24+0000 1.1325 +++ atom.xml 2009-02-20 00:01:02+0000 1.1326 @@ -5,9 +5,30 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:57+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:35+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> + <entry> + <title type="html">Sony's stupid piece of shit</title> + <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/02/sonys-stupid-piece-of-shit.html"/> + <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-887315680807546478</id> + <updated>2009-02-19T19:53:29+00:00</updated> + <content type="html">I just love this one:</content> + <author> + <name>Leif Lodahl</name> + <email>[email protected]</email> + <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title> + <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark. +Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> + <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:35+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry xml:lang="en"> <title type="html">Plone 3.2.1 is now up and running</title> <link href="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1338244/"/> @@ -22,7 +43,7 @@ <title type="html">andreasma_at_ooo</title> <link rel="self" href="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss"/> <id>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:54+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:32+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -61,7 +82,7 @@ <title type="html">andreasma_at_ooo</title> <link rel="self" href="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss"/> <id>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:54+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:32+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -226,7 +247,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:57+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -247,7 +268,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:57+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> @@ -268,89 +289,7 @@ Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:57+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry> - <title type="html">Thanks</title> - <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/thanks.html"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-1874222058448742479</id> - <updated>2009-01-19T21:07:43+00:00</updated> - <content type="html">Thanks to all of you that has wished me happy birthday on my Facebook profile.</content> - <author> - <name>Leif Lodahl</name> - <email>[email protected]</email> - <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title> - <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark. -Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:57+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry> - <title type="html">My first day af my first LotusPhere</title> - <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130</id> - <updated>2009-01-18T22:47:28+00:00</updated> - <content type="html">Ok. Here I am.LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida!This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison?Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</content> - <author> - <name>Leif Lodahl</name> - <email>[email protected]</email> - <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title> - <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark. -Okay, sometimes you can read something about Lotus Notes too</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2009-02-19T18:00:57+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - - <entry xml:lang="en"> - <title type="html">United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</title> - <link href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/"/> - <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</id> - <updated>2009-01-17T18:14:46+00:00</updated> - <content type="html"><p>Some unfortunate news have been spreading around the web recently concerning « OpenOffice.org dying » and has sparkled some interesting articles. I got interviewed <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/interview-with-charles-h-schulz/">here</a>, some <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/what_was_done_for_openoffice">very good answer</a> to those extravagant claims was posted on the Sun OpenOffice.org&#8217;s blog, and I am pretty sure that we will read more and more about it soon.</p> -<p> </p> -<p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> -<ul> -<li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> -</li> -<li> -<p>Michael makes all those claims and that&#8217;s his right to do so but -and that&#8217;s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> -</li> -<li> -<p> <span>Some time ago stats about CVS commits surfaced and the results were eloquent: Sun was by far the strongest contributor. Others counted Novell, Red Hat, Debian, etc. But these were not the second largest contributor. The label â communityâ was the second one. By this it was meant, people with no âfamousâ affiliation contributed more than anything Novell was.</span></p> -</li> -</ul> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>So will we survive a fork from Novell? I do believe we will. First, the fork is already made. I haven&#8217; t seen developers leaving in flock to go-give-your-code-and-let-us-make-money-for-ourselves.org</span></p> -<p> <span>Second, a fork is only really interesting if at some point it sensibly differs from its parent. Concerning the parent, I think a lot of work has to be done but things have improved a lot, the product is great, adoption is exponential and the future looks exciting. The fork itself is a bit of a mystery. Of course, we will likely see some bug hunting and a bunch of cool patches that will end up being implemented inside OpenOffice.org unless those patches are actually ported to the fork. There will also be the much-overstated bazaar-like incremental development (so you don&#8217;t need a roadmap in theory) to consider, but above all, my little finger tells me there will be a lot of âcontributionsâ made to ensure the fork will support more and more</span> <strike><span>Microsoft</span></strike> <span>Novell technologies and hence stay the faithful and loyal second of Microsoft Office for ever.</span></p> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>Still excited about go-oo? Be my guest, go ahead and contribute!</span></p> -<p><br clear="left" /></p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=113&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_113" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></content> - <author> - <name>Charles Schulz</name> - <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings</title> - <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. Schulz.</subtitle> - <link rel="self" href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/> - <id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id> - <updated>2009-02-10T18:00:48+00:00</updated> + <updated>2009-02-20T00:00:35+00:00</updated> </source> </entry> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.1325&r2=1.1326 Delta lines: +16 -67 --------------------- --- index.html 2009-02-19 18:01:24+0000 1.1325 +++ index.html 2009-02-20 00:01:02+0000 1.1326 @@ -28,8 +28,23 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: February 19, 2009 06:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: February 20, 2009 12:00 AM GMT</em></p> +<h2>February 19, 2009</h2> +<h3> +<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog"> +Leif Lodahl</a> : +<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/02/sonys-stupid-piece-of-shit.html";> +Sony's stupid piece of shit</a> +</h3> +<p> +I just love this one:</p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/02/sonys-stupid-piece-of-shit.html";>by Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at February 19, 2009 07:53 PM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>February 15, 2009</h2> <h3> <a href="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/"; title="andreasma_at_ooo"> @@ -244,72 +259,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h2>January 19, 2009</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog"> -Leif Lodahl</a> : -<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/thanks.html";> -Thanks</a> -</h3> -<p> -Thanks to all of you that has wished me happy birthday on my Facebook profile.</p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/thanks.html";>by Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at January 19, 2009 09:07 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> -<h2>January 18, 2009</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog"> -Leif Lodahl</a> : -<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html";> -My first day af my first LotusPhere</a> -</h3> -<p> -Ok. Here I am.LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida!This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison?Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html";>by Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at January 18, 2009 10:47 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> -<h2>January 17, 2009</h2> -<h3> -<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by Standards » OOo Postings"> -Charles Schulz</a> : -<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/";> -United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</a> -</h3> -<p> -<p>Some unfortunate news have been spreading around the web recently concerning « OpenOffice.org dying » and has sparkled some interesting articles. I got interviewed <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/interview-with-charles-h-schulz/";>here</a>, some <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/what_was_done_for_openoffice";>very good answer</a> to those extravagant claims was posted on the Sun OpenOffice.org’s blog, and I am pretty sure that we will read more and more about it soon.</p> -<p> </p> -<p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> -<ul> -<li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we’re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> -</li> -<li> -<p>Michael makes all those claims and that’s his right to do so but -and that’s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> -</li> -<li> -<p> <span>Some time ago stats about CVS commits surfaced and the results were eloquent: Sun was by far the strongest contributor. Others counted Novell, Red Hat, Debian, etc. But these were not the second largest contributor. The label â communityâ was the second one. By this it was meant, people with no âfamousâ affiliation contributed more than anything Novell was.</span></p> -</li> -</ul> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>So will we survive a fork from Novell? I do believe we will. First, the fork is already made. I haven’ t seen developers leaving in flock to go-give-your-code-and-let-us-make-money-for-ourselves.org</span></p> -<p> <span>Second, a fork is only really interesting if at some point it sensibly differs from its parent. Concerning the parent, I think a lot of work has to be done but things have improved a lot, the product is great, adoption is exponential and the future looks exciting. The fork itself is a bit of a mystery. Of course, we will likely see some bug hunting and a bunch of cool patches that will end up being implemented inside OpenOffice.org unless those patches are actually ported to the fork. There will also be the much-overstated bazaar-like incremental development (so you don’t need a roadmap in theory) to consider, but above all, my little finger tells me there will be a lot of âcontributionsâ made to ensure the fork will support more and more</span> <strike><span>Microsoft</span></strike> <span>Novell technologies and hence stay the faithful and loyal second of Microsoft Office for ever.</span></p> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>Still excited about go-oo? Be my guest, go ahead and contribute!</span></p> -<p><br clear="left" /></p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=113&akst_action=share-this"; title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_113" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/";>by Charles at January 17, 2009 06:14 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.1325&r2=1.1326 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2009-02-19 18:01:24+0000 1.1325 +++ opml.xml 2009-02-20 00:01:02+0000 1.1326 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Native Language Confederation Planet</title> - <dateModified>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:00:57 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:35 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Native Language Confederation</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.266&r2=1.267 Delta lines: +8 -44 -------------------- --- rss10.xml 2009-02-15 18:01:16+0000 1.266 +++ rss10.xml 2009-02-20 00:01:02+0000 1.267 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-887315680807546478" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1338244/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/7957952/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1337523/"; /> @@ -24,13 +25,17 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5793386253252560956" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2018890069278905332" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-7315913127662280081" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-1874222058448742479" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130" /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/"; /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-887315680807546478"> + <title>Leif Lodahl: Sony's stupid piece of shit</title> + <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/02/sonys-stupid-piece-of-shit.html</link> + <content:encoded>I just love this one:</content:encoded> + <dc:date>2009-02-19T19:53:29+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> +</item> <item rdf:about="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1338244/";> <title>Andreas Mantke: Plone 3.2.1 is now up and running</title> <link>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1338244/</link> @@ -156,46 +161,5 @@ <dc:date>2009-01-21T15:36:43+00:00</dc:date> <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> </item> -<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-1874222058448742479"> - <title>Leif Lodahl: Thanks</title> - <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/thanks.html</link> - <content:encoded>Thanks to all of you that has wished me happy birthday on my Facebook profile.</content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-01-19T21:07:43+00:00</dc:date> - <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> -</item> -<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130"> - <title>Leif Lodahl: My first day af my first LotusPhere</title> - <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html</link> - <content:encoded>Ok. Here I am.LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida!This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison?Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-01-18T22:47:28+00:00</dc:date> - <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> -</item> -<item rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/";> - <title>Charles Schulz: United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</title> - <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</link> - <content:encoded><p>Some unfortunate news have been spreading around the web recently concerning « OpenOffice.org dying » and has sparkled some interesting articles. I got interviewed <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/interview-with-charles-h-schulz/">here</a>, some <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/what_was_done_for_openoffice">very good answer</a> to those extravagant claims was posted on the Sun OpenOffice.org&#8217;s blog, and I am pretty sure that we will read more and more about it soon.</p> -<p> </p> -<p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> -<ul> -<li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> -</li> -<li> -<p>Michael makes all those claims and that&#8217;s his right to do so but -and that&#8217;s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> -</li> -<li> -<p> <span>Some time ago stats about CVS commits surfaced and the results were eloquent: Sun was by far the strongest contributor. Others counted Novell, Red Hat, Debian, etc. But these were not the second largest contributor. The label â communityâ was the second one. By this it was meant, people with no âfamousâ affiliation contributed more than anything Novell was.</span></p> -</li> -</ul> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>So will we survive a fork from Novell? I do believe we will. First, the fork is already made. I haven&#8217; t seen developers leaving in flock to go-give-your-code-and-let-us-make-money-for-ourselves.org</span></p> -<p> <span>Second, a fork is only really interesting if at some point it sensibly differs from its parent. Concerning the parent, I think a lot of work has to be done but things have improved a lot, the product is great, adoption is exponential and the future looks exciting. The fork itself is a bit of a mystery. Of course, we will likely see some bug hunting and a bunch of cool patches that will end up being implemented inside OpenOffice.org unless those patches are actually ported to the fork. There will also be the much-overstated bazaar-like incremental development (so you don&#8217;t need a roadmap in theory) to consider, but above all, my little finger tells me there will be a lot of âcontributionsâ made to ensure the fork will support more and more</span> <strike><span>Microsoft</span></strike> <span>Novell technologies and hence stay the faithful and loyal second of Microsoft Office for ever.</span></p> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>Still excited about go-oo? Be my guest, go ahead and contribute!</span></p> -<p><br clear="left" /></p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=113&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_113" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></content:encoded> - <dc:date>2009-01-17T18:14:46+00:00</dc:date> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.267&r2=1.268 Delta lines: +8 -44 -------------------- --- rss20.xml 2009-02-15 18:01:16+0000 1.267 +++ rss20.xml 2009-02-20 00:01:02+0000 1.268 @@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ <description>Native Language Confederation Planet - http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>Leif Lodahl: Sony's stupid piece of shit</title> + <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-887315680807546478</guid> + <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/02/sonys-stupid-piece-of-shit.html</link> + <description>I just love this one:</description> + <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate> + <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> +</item> +<item> <title>Andreas Mantke: Plone 3.2.1 is now up and running</title> <guid>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1338244/</guid> <link>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1338244/</link> @@ -137,50 +145,6 @@ <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:36:43 +0000</pubDate> <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> </item> -<item> - <title>Leif Lodahl: Thanks</title> - <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-1874222058448742479</guid> - <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/thanks.html</link> - <description>Thanks to all of you that has wished me happy birthday on my Facebook profile.</description> - <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:07:43 +0000</pubDate> - <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> -</item> -<item> - <title>Leif Lodahl: My first day af my first LotusPhere</title> - <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-5862896029535739130</guid> - <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-first-day-af-my-first-lotusphere.html</link> - <description>Ok. Here I am.LotusPhere 2009, Orlando, Florida!This is my first LotusPhere and the first day (Business Development Day) is almost over. My impresison?Perfect arrangement. Even considering that we are about one hour late and that the last slot is cancelled, I guess thats what to expect, when you gather all business partners on one spot. Transportation and logistics are perfect and the hotel</description> - <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate> - <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author> -</item> -<item> - <title>Charles Schulz: United we stand, dividedâ¦we are still standing.</title> - <guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</guid> - <link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/01/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-are-still-standing/</link> - <description><p>Some unfortunate news have been spreading around the web recently concerning « OpenOffice.org dying » and has sparkled some interesting articles. I got interviewed <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/interview-with-charles-h-schulz/">here</a>, some <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/what_was_done_for_openoffice">very good answer</a> to those extravagant claims was posted on the Sun OpenOffice.org&#8217;s blog, and I am pretty sure that we will read more and more about it soon.</p> -<p> </p> -<p>I would just like to mention three additional points before describing my view of a â post-Novellâ OpenOffice.org.</p> -<ul> -<li> -<p>The claims made by Michael Meeks, especially the ones related to the kind of data he shows do not take into account the extensions repository. I agree that extensions are by definition not part of the code base, but given the rate of upload of new extensions we&#8217;re having at the moment (50 extensions during December 2008) this starts to become non-trivial. Hence the data does not take into account the contributions made almost exclusively by non-Sun staff.</p> -</li> -<li> -<p>Michael makes all those claims and that&#8217;s his right to do so but -and that&#8217;s not an ad-hominem attack- one should remember that <em>Michael Meeks has not contributed a single line of code to OpenOffice.org since two years</em>. <span>Both his own blog and the logs of the commits show that Michael is nowhere to be seen. What shall we be doing with this? Pretty simply, I value both code and non-code contributions (contrary to Michael), and I have a hard time understanding where Michael stands anywhere in our community. Calling OpenOffice.org anything similar to a dead horse is a strong statement for someone who does not contribute, but only criticizes a project.</span></p> -</li> -<li> -<p> <span>Some time ago stats about CVS commits surfaced and the results were eloquent: Sun was by far the strongest contributor. Others counted Novell, Red Hat, Debian, etc. But these were not the second largest contributor. The label â communityâ was the second one. By this it was meant, people with no âfamousâ affiliation contributed more than anything Novell was.</span></p> -</li> -</ul> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>So will we survive a fork from Novell? I do believe we will. First, the fork is already made. I haven&#8217; t seen developers leaving in flock to go-give-your-code-and-let-us-make-money-for-ourselves.org</span></p> -<p> <span>Second, a fork is only really interesting if at some point it sensibly differs from its parent. Concerning the parent, I think a lot of work has to be done but things have improved a lot, the product is great, adoption is exponential and the future looks exciting. The fork itself is a bit of a mystery. Of course, we will likely see some bug hunting and a bunch of cool patches that will end up being implemented inside OpenOffice.org unless those patches are actually ported to the fork. There will also be the much-overstated bazaar-like incremental development (so you don&#8217;t need a roadmap in theory) to consider, but above all, my little finger tells me there will be a lot of âcontributionsâ made to ensure the fork will support more and more</span> <strike><span>Microsoft</span></strike> <span>Novell technologies and hence stay the faithful and loyal second of Microsoft Office for ever.</span></p> -<p> </p> -<p> <span>Still excited about go-oo? Be my guest, go ahead and contribute!</span></p> -<p><br clear="left" /></p> -<p class="akst_link"><a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=113&akst_action=share-this" title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_113" class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a> -</p></description> - <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:14:46 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
