User: jpmcc   
Date: 2009-10-01 10:58:52+0000
Modified:
   native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml
   native-lang/www/planet/index.html
   native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml
   native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml
   native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml

Log:
 Planet run at Thu Oct  1 12:00:35 BST 2009

File Changes:

Directory: /native-lang/www/planet/
===================================

File [changed]: atom.xml
Url: 
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.2210&r2=1.2211
Delta lines:  +33 -64
---------------------
--- atom.xml    2009-10-01 04:59:00+0000        1.2210
+++ atom.xml    2009-10-01 10:58:49+0000        1.2211
@@ -5,10 +5,31 @@
        <link rel="self" 
href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/>
        <link href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/"/>
        <id>http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id>
-       <updated>2009-10-01T05:00:40+00:00</updated>
+       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
        <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 
+http://www.planetplanet.org</generator>
 
        <entry>
+               <title type="html">Registration is open</title>
+               <link 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/10/registration-is-open.html"/>
+               
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3332540983495316552</id>
+               <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
+               <content type="html">The registration for the annual OOoCon is 
now open 
http://conference.services.openoffice.org/index.php/ooocon/2009/schedConf/registration.</content>
+               <author>
+                       <name>Leif Lodahl</name>
+                       <email>[email protected]</email>
+                       <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri>
+               </author>
+               <source>
+                       <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title>
+                       <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source 
software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on 
my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark.
+Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
+                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
+                       <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
+               </source>
+       </entry>
+
+       <entry>
                <title type="html">Yet another city</title>
                <link 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html"/>
                
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852</id>
@@ -25,7 +46,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -46,7 +67,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -69,7 +90,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -87,7 +108,7 @@
                        <title type="html">andreasma_at_ooo</title>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss"/>
                        <id>http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/rss</id>
-                       <updated>2009-10-01T05:00:37+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:36+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -108,7 +129,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -129,7 +150,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -150,7 +171,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -171,7 +192,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -192,7 +213,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -256,7 +277,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 
@@ -277,59 +298,7 @@
 Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
                        <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
                        <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
-               </source>
-       </entry>
-
-       <entry>
-               <title type="html">OpenOffice 3.1.1 released</title>
-               <link 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/08/openoffice-311-almost-released.html"/>
-               
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2176431139066722436</id>
-               <updated>2009-08-31T19:54:21+00:00</updated>
-               <content type="html">Today Monday will be the day of 
OpenOffice.org 3.1.1. This is a bug-fix version and there are no actual new 
features this time.Be aware of fraud websites that are offering OpenOffice.org 
for money. In best case you will be paying for something that is actually free 
- or worse - you (sorry, your computer) will get infected by virus or 
trojans.OpenOffice.org is free. You can download it from</content>
-               <author>
-                       <name>Leif Lodahl</name>
-                       <email>[email protected]</email>
-                       <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri>
-               </author>
-               <source>
-                       <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title>
-                       <subtitle type="html">OpenOffice.org, open source 
software and open standards. These are the three things you can read about on 
my blog. I'll try to keep you updated on news and events in Denmark.
-Okay, sometimes you can read about Lotus Notes too</subtitle>
-                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/>
-                       <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-30T11:00:40+00:00</updated>
-               </source>
-       </entry>
-
-       <entry xml:lang="en">
-               <title type="html">Mythbusting in the end of August</title>
-               <link 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/"/>
-               
<id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</id>
-               <updated>2009-08-31T16:01:45+00:00</updated>
-               <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Coming back from vacations I 
think it&amp;#8217;s a good time to set the clocks back at the right time. The 
month of August was not vacation time for everyone. In fact, there was a small 
revolution that went unnoticed if you did not pay attention to the events 
inside the &lt;a href=&quot;http://opensuse.org&quot;&gt;OpenSuse 
Community&lt;/a&gt;. There was also a &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=TheOpenRoad&quot;&gt;very
 good blog post by Matt Asay&lt;/a&gt;, but Matt still does not get that 
sometimes official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Today, I will try to bust some myths and 
attempt to explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially 
in the field of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;After some intense debate, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news&quot;&gt;the 
OpenSuse Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default 
desktop.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;This decision that some might find 
surprising is actually not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the 
Linux desktop every day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not 
the most overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best 
funded desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular 
one (to be sure, it&amp;#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop 
environments). It is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the 
OpenSuse project. SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell 
offerings, was a predominantly KDE distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;But with its acquisition and the buyout of 
Ximian, Gnome became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come 
to appreciate so far such as Mono. Don&amp;#8217;t get me wrong; I&amp;#8217;m 
not pondering whether KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&amp;#8217;m just 
pointing out that for years we were told that there was no other way outside 
Gnome by some who had vested economic interests in this platform. KDE did its 
transformation through its 4.0 release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome 
has a different philosophy: it aims at developing an easy to use desktop that 
can be easily portable. I am sure that we will see some radical improvements in 
the Gnome 3.0 release, albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet 
KDE 4 is quickly picking up steam by using some appealing technologies such as 
Qt, while Gnome has to deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK 
versions. These liabilities make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web 
application in comparison. It is of course impossible at this stage to guess 
who will be the dominant desktop environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 
years. Times are changing. On a personal level, I most often use Gnome but 
spend more and more time on KDE. In fact, this blog is written on KDE.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The announcement by the OpenSuse Community 
that it would revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about 
the immaturity of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic 
market share.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The use of the word 
&amp;#8220;anemic&amp;#8221; comes from Matt Asay&amp;#8217;s blog. Let me make 
this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 release has generated over 20 
million downloads. The news can be found at the OpenOffice.org website, but the 
bottomline is that our infrastructure is suffering from the number of 
downloads. These downloads are just the ones officially counted in our 
infrastructure. There are many servers out there we simply don&amp;#8217;t 
count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account the number of 
OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the numbers of 
these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the total Linux 
market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is now more an 
ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique downloads 
and IP addresses &amp;#8216; counters report over a million users of Fedora 10. 
What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&amp;#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1.1&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Of course, these numbers may look anemic 
when compared to Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite 
relevant; I don&amp;#8217;t know many people who rush over to download 
Microsoft Office for free. They usually get it on their computers and 
don&amp;#8217;t think about it much further. So Matt is essentially comparing 
apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to walk all the way to the user; it 
basically lands on consumers, thanks to longstanding OEM agreements with 
Microsoft and monopolistic practices. OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may 
be anemic to some, but we will never be monopolistic to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&amp;akst_action=share-this&quot;
 title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; 
id=&quot;akst_link_137&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot; 
rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;</content>
-               <author>
-                       <name>Charles Schulz</name>
-                       <uri>http://standardsandfreedom.net</uri>
-               </author>
-               <source>
-                       <title type="html">Moved by Freedom - Powered by 
Standards » OOo Postings</title>
-                       <subtitle type="html">A weblog by Charles-H. 
Schulz.</subtitle>
-                       <link rel="self" 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed"/>
-                       
<id>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/category/ooo-postings/feed</id>
-                       <updated>2009-09-29T23:00:45+00:00</updated>
+                       <updated>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</updated>
                </source>
        </entry>
 

File [changed]: index.html
Url: 
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.2210&r2=1.2211
Delta lines:  +16 -42
---------------------
--- index.html  2009-10-01 04:59:00+0000        1.2210
+++ index.html  2009-10-01 10:58:49+0000        1.2211
@@ -29,8 +29,23 @@
 <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a>
 </div>
 
-<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a 
href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: October 01, 2009 05:00 AM 
GMT</em></p>
+<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a 
href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: October 01, 2009 11:00 AM 
GMT</em></p>
 
+<h2>October 01, 2009</h2>
+<h3>
+<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog">
+Leif Lodahl</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
+<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/10/registration-is-open.html";>
+Registration is open</a>
+</h3>
+<p>
+The registration for the annual OOoCon is now open 
http://conference.services.openoffice.org/index.php/ooocon/2009/schedConf/registration.</p>
+<p>
+<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/10/registration-is-open.html";>by 
Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at October 01, 2009 11:00 AM GMT</a></em>
+</p>
+<br />
+<hr />
+<br />
 <h2>September 29, 2009</h2>
 <h3>
 <a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog">
@@ -236,47 +251,6 @@
 <br />
 <hr />
 <br />
-<h2>August 31, 2009</h2>
-<h3>
-<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog">
-Leif Lodahl</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
-<a 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/08/openoffice-311-almost-released.html";>
-OpenOffice 3.1.1 released</a>
-</h3>
-<p>
-Today Monday will be the day of OpenOffice.org 3.1.1. This is a bug-fix 
version and there are no actual new features this time.Be aware of fraud 
websites that are offering OpenOffice.org for money. In best case you will be 
paying for something that is actually free - or worse - you (sorry, your 
computer) will get infected by virus or trojans.OpenOffice.org is free. You can 
download it from</p>
-<p>
-<em><a 
href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/08/openoffice-311-almost-released.html";>by
 Leif Lodahl ([email protected]) at August 31, 2009 07:54 PM BST</a></em>
-</p>
-<br />
-<hr />
-<br />
-<h3>
-<a href="http://standardsandfreedom.net"; title="Moved by Freedom - Powered by 
Standards » OOo Postings">
-Charles Schulz</a>&nbsp;:&nbsp;
-<a 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";>
-Mythbusting in the end of August</a>
-</h3>
-<p>
-<p>Coming back from vacations I think it&#8217;s a good time to set the clocks 
back at the right time. The month of August was not vacation time for everyone. 
In fact, there was a small revolution that went unnoticed if you did not pay 
attention to the events inside the <a href="http://opensuse.org";>OpenSuse 
Community</a>. There was also a <a 
href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=TheOpenRoad";>very
 good blog post by Matt Asay</a>, but Matt still does not get that sometimes 
official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.</p>
-<p class="Standard">Today, I will try to bust some myths and attempt to 
explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially in the field 
of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.</p>
-<p class="Standard">Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough</p>
-<p class="Standard">After some intense debate, <a 
href="http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news";>the OpenSuse 
Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default desktop.</a></p>
-<p class="Standard">This decision that some might find surprising is actually 
not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the Linux desktop every 
day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not the most 
overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best funded 
desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular one (to 
be sure, it&#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop environments). It 
is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the OpenSuse project. 
SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell offerings, was a 
predominantly KDE distribution.</p>
-<p class="Standard">But with its acquisition and the buyout of Ximian, Gnome 
became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come to appreciate 
so far such as Mono. Don&#8217;t get me wrong; I&#8217;m not pondering whether 
KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&#8217;m just pointing out that for years 
we were told that there was no other way outside Gnome by some who had vested 
economic interests in this platform. KDE did its transformation through its 4.0 
release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome has a different philosophy: it 
aims at developing an easy to use desktop that can be easily portable. I am 
sure that we will see some radical improvements in the Gnome 3.0 release, 
albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet KDE 4 is quickly picking 
up steam by using some appealing technologies such as Qt, while Gnome has to 
deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK versions. These liabilities 
make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web application in comparison. It 
is of course impossible at this stage to guess who will be the dominant desktop 
environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 years. Times are changing. On a 
personal level, I most often use Gnome but spend more and more time on KDE. In 
fact, this blog is written on KDE.</p>
-<p class="Standard">The announcement by the OpenSuse Community that it would 
revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about the immaturity 
of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.</p>
-<p class="Standard">Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic market share.</p>
-<p class="Standard">The use of the word &#8220;anemic&#8221; comes from Matt 
Asay&#8217;s blog. Let me make this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 
release has generated over 20 million downloads. The news can be found at the 
OpenOffice.org website, but the bottomline is that our infrastructure is 
suffering from the number of downloads. These downloads are just the ones 
officially counted in our infrastructure. There are many servers out there we 
simply don&#8217;t count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account 
the number of OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the 
numbers of these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the 
total Linux market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is 
now more an ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique 
downloads and IP addresses &#8216; counters report over a million users of 
Fedora 10. What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
<a href="http://download.openoffice.org/";>OpenOffice.org 3.1.1</a> .</p>
-<p class="Standard">Of course, these numbers may look anemic when compared to 
Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite relevant; I don&#8217;t 
know many people who rush over to download Microsoft Office for free. They 
usually get it on their computers and don&#8217;t think about it much further. 
So Matt is essentially comparing apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to 
walk all the way to the user; it basically lands on consumers, thanks to 
longstanding OEM agreements with Microsoft and monopolistic practices. 
OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may be anemic to some, but we will never be 
monopolistic to anyone.</p>
-<p class="Standard">&nbsp;</p>
-<p class="akst_link"><a 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&akst_action=share-this"; 
title="E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc." id="akst_link_137" 
class="akst_share_link" rel="nofollow">Share This</a>
-</p></p>
-<p>
-<em><a 
href="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";>by
 Charles at August 31, 2009 04:01 PM GMT</a></em>
-</p>
-<br />
-<hr />
-<br />
 <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a>
 <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those 
 of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the 

File [changed]: opml.xml
Url: 
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.2210&r2=1.2211
Delta lines:  +1 -1
-------------------
--- opml.xml    2009-10-01 04:59:00+0000        1.2210
+++ opml.xml    2009-10-01 10:58:49+0000        1.2211
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 <opml version="1.1">
        <head>
                <title>Native Language Confederation Planet</title>
-               <dateModified>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:00:40 +0000</dateModified>
+               <dateModified>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:00:40 +0000</dateModified>
                <ownerName>Native Language Confederation</ownerName>
                <ownerEmail>[email protected]</ownerEmail>
        </head>

File [changed]: rss10.xml
Url: 
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.360&r2=1.361
Delta lines:  +8 -27
--------------------
--- rss10.xml   2009-09-29 16:59:03+0000        1.360
+++ rss10.xml   2009-10-01 10:58:49+0000        1.361
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
        <items>
                <rdf:Seq>
+                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3332540983495316552"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8718185590131291864"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-9216480267512724012"
 />
@@ -25,12 +26,17 @@
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:sophiegautier.com,2009-09-13:/blog/125" />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8061074245084276781"
 />
                        <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-1684845849941232610"
 />
-                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2176431139066722436"
 />
-                       <rdf:li 
rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";
 />
                </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
 </channel>
 
+<item 
rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3332540983495316552">
+       <title>Leif Lodahl: Registration is open</title>
+       
<link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/10/registration-is-open.html</link>
+       <content:encoded>The registration for the annual OOoCon is now open 
http://conference.services.openoffice.org/index.php/ooocon/2009/schedConf/registration.</content:encoded>
+       <dc:date>2009-10-01T11:00:39+00:00</dc:date>
+       <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator>
+</item>
 <item 
rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852">
        <title>Leif Lodahl: Yet another city</title>
        <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html</link>
@@ -140,30 +146,5 @@
        <dc:date>2009-09-02T22:15:52+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator>
 </item>
-<item 
rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2176431139066722436">
-       <title>Leif Lodahl: OpenOffice 3.1.1 released</title>
-       
<link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/08/openoffice-311-almost-released.html</link>
-       <content:encoded>Today Monday will be the day of OpenOffice.org 3.1.1. 
This is a bug-fix version and there are no actual new features this time.Be 
aware of fraud websites that are offering OpenOffice.org for money. In best 
case you will be paying for something that is actually free - or worse - you 
(sorry, your computer) will get infected by virus or trojans.OpenOffice.org is 
free. You can download it from</content:encoded>
-       <dc:date>2009-08-31T19:54:21+00:00</dc:date>
-       <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator>
-</item>
-<item 
rdf:about="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/";>
-       <title>Charles Schulz: Mythbusting in the end of August</title>
-       
<link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</link>
-       <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Coming back from vacations I think 
it&amp;#8217;s a good time to set the clocks back at the right time. The month 
of August was not vacation time for everyone. In fact, there was a small 
revolution that went unnoticed if you did not pay attention to the events 
inside the &lt;a href=&quot;http://opensuse.org&quot;&gt;OpenSuse 
Community&lt;/a&gt;. There was also a &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=TheOpenRoad&quot;&gt;very
 good blog post by Matt Asay&lt;/a&gt;, but Matt still does not get that 
sometimes official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Today, I will try to bust some myths and 
attempt to explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially 
in the field of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;After some intense debate, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news&quot;&gt;the 
OpenSuse Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default 
desktop.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;This decision that some might find 
surprising is actually not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the 
Linux desktop every day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not 
the most overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best 
funded desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular 
one (to be sure, it&amp;#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop 
environments). It is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the 
OpenSuse project. SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell 
offerings, was a predominantly KDE distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;But with its acquisition and the buyout of 
Ximian, Gnome became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come 
to appreciate so far such as Mono. Don&amp;#8217;t get me wrong; I&amp;#8217;m 
not pondering whether KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&amp;#8217;m just 
pointing out that for years we were told that there was no other way outside 
Gnome by some who had vested economic interests in this platform. KDE did its 
transformation through its 4.0 release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome 
has a different philosophy: it aims at developing an easy to use desktop that 
can be easily portable. I am sure that we will see some radical improvements in 
the Gnome 3.0 release, albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet 
KDE 4 is quickly picking up steam by using some appealing technologies such as 
Qt, while Gnome has to deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK 
versions. These liabilities make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web 
application in comparison. It is of course impossible at this stage to guess 
who will be the dominant desktop environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 
years. Times are changing. On a personal level, I most often use Gnome but 
spend more and more time on KDE. In fact, this blog is written on KDE.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The announcement by the OpenSuse Community 
that it would revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about 
the immaturity of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic 
market share.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The use of the word 
&amp;#8220;anemic&amp;#8221; comes from Matt Asay&amp;#8217;s blog. Let me make 
this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 release has generated over 20 
million downloads. The news can be found at the OpenOffice.org website, but the 
bottomline is that our infrastructure is suffering from the number of 
downloads. These downloads are just the ones officially counted in our 
infrastructure. There are many servers out there we simply don&amp;#8217;t 
count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account the number of 
OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the numbers of 
these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the total Linux 
market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is now more an 
ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique downloads 
and IP addresses &amp;#8216; counters report over a million users of Fedora 10. 
What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&amp;#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1.1&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Of course, these numbers may look anemic 
when compared to Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite 
relevant; I don&amp;#8217;t know many people who rush over to download 
Microsoft Office for free. They usually get it on their computers and 
don&amp;#8217;t think about it much further. So Matt is essentially comparing 
apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to walk all the way to the user; it 
basically lands on consumers, thanks to longstanding OEM agreements with 
Microsoft and monopolistic practices. OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may 
be anemic to some, but we will never be monopolistic to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&amp;akst_action=share-this&quot;
 title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; 
id=&quot;akst_link_137&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot; 
rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
-       <dc:date>2009-08-31T16:01:45+00:00</dc:date>
-</item>
 
 </rdf:RDF>

File [changed]: rss20.xml
Url: 
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.361&r2=1.362
Delta lines:  +8 -27
--------------------
--- rss20.xml   2009-09-29 16:59:03+0000        1.361
+++ rss20.xml   2009-10-01 10:58:49+0000        1.362
@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@
        <description>Native Language Confederation Planet - 
http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/</description>
 
 <item>
+       <title>Leif Lodahl: Registration is open</title>
+       
<guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3332540983495316552</guid>
+       
<link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/10/registration-is-open.html</link>
+       <description>The registration for the annual OOoCon is now open 
http://conference.services.openoffice.org/index.php/ooocon/2009/schedConf/registration.</description>
+       <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
+       <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author>
+</item>
+<item>
        <title>Leif Lodahl: Yet another city</title>
        
<guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2624949812557043852</guid>
        <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/09/yet-another-city.html</link>
@@ -127,33 +135,6 @@
        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
        <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author>
 </item>
-<item>
-       <title>Leif Lodahl: OpenOffice 3.1.1 released</title>
-       
<guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-2176431139066722436</guid>
-       
<link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2009/08/openoffice-311-almost-released.html</link>
-       <description>Today Monday will be the day of OpenOffice.org 3.1.1. This 
is a bug-fix version and there are no actual new features this time.Be aware of 
fraud websites that are offering OpenOffice.org for money. In best case you 
will be paying for something that is actually free - or worse - you (sorry, 
your computer) will get infected by virus or trojans.OpenOffice.org is free. 
You can download it from</description>
-       <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
-       <author>[email protected] (Leif Lodahl)</author>
-</item>
-<item>
-       <title>Charles Schulz: Mythbusting in the end of August</title>
-       
<guid>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</guid>
-       
<link>http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2009/08/31/mythbusting-in-the-end-of-august/</link>
-       <description>&lt;p&gt;Coming back from vacations I think it&amp;#8217;s 
a good time to set the clocks back at the right time. The month of August was 
not vacation time for everyone. In fact, there was a small revolution that went 
unnoticed if you did not pay attention to the events inside the &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://opensuse.org&quot;&gt;OpenSuse Community&lt;/a&gt;. There was 
also a &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10320382-16.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=TheOpenRoad&quot;&gt;very
 good blog post by Matt Asay&lt;/a&gt;, but Matt still does not get that 
sometimes official stats and metrics do not reflect the reality well.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Today, I will try to bust some myths and 
attempt to explain why things are not always what they seem to be, especially 
in the field of Free/Libre and Open Source Software.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #1: KDE is not mature enough&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;After some intense debate, &lt;a 
href=&quot;http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090824#news&quot;&gt;the 
OpenSuse Community has decided that KDE 4 would be its default 
desktop.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;This decision that some might find 
surprising is actually not so much a surprise than revealing the reality of the 
Linux desktop every day users. First, it shows that the Gnome desktop is not 
the most overwhelmingly used desktop environment for Linux. It may be the best 
funded desktop environment project, but it is not necessarily the most popular 
one (to be sure, it&amp;#8217;s one of the two most popular Linux desktop 
environments). It is particularly striking to witness such a change inside the 
OpenSuse project. SUSE itself, before being integrated inside the Novell 
offerings, was a predominantly KDE distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;But with its acquisition and the buyout of 
Ximian, Gnome became the default, dragging along all the niceties we have come 
to appreciate so far such as Mono. Don&amp;#8217;t get me wrong; I&amp;#8217;m 
not pondering whether KDE is a better desktop than Gnome: I&amp;#8217;m just 
pointing out that for years we were told that there was no other way outside 
Gnome by some who had vested economic interests in this platform. KDE did its 
transformation through its 4.0 release, offering a brand new platform. Gnome 
has a different philosophy: it aims at developing an easy to use desktop that 
can be easily portable. I am sure that we will see some radical improvements in 
the Gnome 3.0 release, albeit at a different pace and in a different way. Yet 
KDE 4 is quickly picking up steam by using some appealing technologies such as 
Qt, while Gnome has to deal with a legacy platform and its different GTK 
versions. These liabilities make OpenOffice.org look like a lightweight web 
application in comparison. It is of course impossible at this stage to guess 
who will be the dominant desktop environment on Linux in the next 5 or 10 
years. Times are changing. On a personal level, I most often use Gnome but 
spend more and more time on KDE. In fact, this blog is written on KDE.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The announcement by the OpenSuse Community 
that it would revert back to KDE will hopefully help dispell some myths about 
the immaturity of KDE 4 and all the advantages of Gnome.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Myth #2: OpenOffice.org has an anemic 
market share.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;The use of the word 
&amp;#8220;anemic&amp;#8221; comes from Matt Asay&amp;#8217;s blog. Let me make 
this straight: OpenOffice.org in its sole 3.1 release has generated over 20 
million downloads. The news can be found at the OpenOffice.org website, but the 
bottomline is that our infrastructure is suffering from the number of 
downloads. These downloads are just the ones officially counted in our 
infrastructure. There are many servers out there we simply don&amp;#8217;t 
count in our stats. These downloads do not take into account the number of 
OpenOffice.org suites shipped with Linux distributions, and the numbers of 
these ones may be subject to controversy: but pretending that the total Linux 
market share for desktop is ridiculous (typically less than 2 %) is now more an 
ideological statement than an estimation to rely on. Fedora unique downloads 
and IP addresses &amp;#8216; counters report over a million users of Fedora 10. 
What about Ubuntu and its flavors? But let&amp;#8217;s go back to 
OpenOffice.org: 20 million downloads for the 3.1 release, and we just released 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://download.openoffice.org/&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org 
3.1.1&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;Of course, these numbers may look anemic 
when compared to Microsoft Office. But the comparison may not be quite 
relevant; I don&amp;#8217;t know many people who rush over to download 
Microsoft Office for free. They usually get it on their computers and 
don&amp;#8217;t think about it much further. So Matt is essentially comparing 
apples to bananas. MS Office does not have to walk all the way to the user; it 
basically lands on consumers, thanks to longstanding OEM agreements with 
Microsoft and monopolistic practices. OpenOffice.org does not do that. We may 
be anemic to some, but we will never be monopolistic to anyone.&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;Standard&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
-&lt;p class=&quot;akst_link&quot;&gt;&lt;a 
href=&quot;http://standardsandfreedom.net/?p=137&amp;akst_action=share-this&quot;
 title=&quot;E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.&quot; 
id=&quot;akst_link_137&quot; class=&quot;akst_share_link&quot; 
rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Share This&lt;/a&gt;
-&lt;/p&gt;</description>
-       <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
-</item>
 
 </channel>
 </rss>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to