On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:54:16 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bo Berglund) wrote:
>Interestingly we found a problem with timestamping going the other >waythan what has been discussed here before. >What happened was that one developer having a module checked out and >updated decided to serach-and-replace an identifier across the whole >module (several dozen files). He used some kind of strange editor to >do this that preserved the timestamp of the file! So now he had a I presume said editor since been deleted from his hard disk!!! The way CVS does it is reasonable (ie. what you want 90% of the time). There'll always be cases where it would have been nice to do it some other way though. Tony _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
