Hello Tony, Thursday, June 6, 2002, 1:17:59 PM, you wrote:
TH> Richard Wirth wrote: >> Hello Tony, >> >> one other thought about the free() replacing NetApiBufferFree(): >> NetApi...() functions are native win32 calls. While free() is a >> function of the (compiler provider suplied) C-runtime. Thus I suspect >> using free() in this case will break the code (at least when using a >> different compiler). >> >> TH> In this case the buffer is generated by malloc() further up (in TH> GetPrimaryGroup). Unless the pointer has changed (it hasn't) then TH> purify is wrong - the fact that the buffer is subsequently used by one TH> of the NetApi functions does not mean that it must be freed by TH> NetApiBufferFree. TH> Tony sorry, I was at the wrong line of code (I should always do a 'cvs diff' before speaking...;-) You are right, the free() the correct thing to do here! -- Best regards, Richard mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Cvsnt mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt
