On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:05:15 +0000, Peter Crowther <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Bo Berglund >> I can't understand why anyone could be actively using the email >> interface when there exists a news interface.... > >As an example: I have a single interface for messages that don't need instant >response. It's Microsoft Outlook (for my sins!) Outlook handles newsgroups >poorly - they're managed as Exchange public folders, and even that >functionality is going away. > >Adding another place to look for messages doubles the complexity of managing >my messages. I cannot easily change my mail client (long story, but a common >one in businesses). Therefore the email interface is more functional *for me* >than the newsgroup interface. I accept that where there is an unconstrained >choice of message reader, the balance is likely to be different. > I also use Outlook 2003 at work and I do get the emails there but I have a filter to move them out of the way and I very seldom read them there. The bulk of my CVSNT communications is done from home and here I use Forte Free Agent as newsreader (I have used it since the dawn of evolution, or at least since 2000). With that I am able to see all messages belonging to a single thread together and I don't have to have subscribed to email in order to get them all. In fact I can read any back messages I like in the newsreader. Beats email any day! However, as mentioned I have email enabled into Outlook at work because the IT department in its wisdom has blocked the NNTP port in the corporate firewall! So I update from time to time my news messages whenever I am connected elsewhere tan within the company (my PC is a laptop...). -- /Bo (Bo Berglund, developer in Sweden) _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list [email protected] http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt Upgrade to CVS Suite for more features and support: http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/
