On Wednesday 07 December 2005 10:41 am, David Dooling wrote: > Admittedly, a while ago, SLUUG discuss had more complaining about what > people were posting (and complaining about the complaining) than > useful posts, but it seems better now (it was so bad I left the list > for a year or so).
good points, david. however, to my knowledge sluug still has no form of moderation whatsoever on the list, so problems could erupt again at any time. the reason i like this (admittedly smaller) list is that the signal to noise ratio is in general far higher *more consistently*, & i attribute that to (a) the fine folks on this list, & (b) the fact that it *is* moderated. if someone acts up, they're warned & then banned. that's good list management, in my book. scott -- R. Scott Granneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ www.granneman.com Full list of publications: http://www.granneman.com/publications My new book on Firefox: Don't Click on the Blue E! Info at: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/bluee/ Read the Open Source Blog: http://opensource.weblogsinc.com Join GranneNotes! Information at www.granneman.com "Where facts are few, experts are many." ---Donald R. Gannon _______________________________________________ CWE-LUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.cwelug.org/ http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/
