On 5 Sep 2006, at 22:22, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> 5) Meaningful: 'lightweight soap'. > > I really would prefer not promoting that. While a cool meaning, the project > needs to be viewed as more than just a soap stack. It needs to be views as > more of a SOA enabling framework or similar. > +1 I'd be concerned about concentrating on the SOAP aspect of what is supposed to be a *merging* of Celtix and XFire. Mark.
