> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: tooling and service model > > > James Mao wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Actually Tom and I already started working on that. and we > will create > > jira tasks, later you can review and comment on that. > > And i think WSDL2 is going to next Milestone, right? I > think SOAP1.2 > > is more important than WSDL2 at moment. > > > I don't think there is any sense in adding soap 1.2 to the > current tool > set if we're just going to rewrite it anyway. I'd just assume > start on > the new tools now. > > > I have finished the Dispatch/Provider with XML/HTTP support , and i > > think Jervis have got the provider based RESTful service > working, and > > later he will add the demo to show how it works. > > I was looking through this today, and I think it needs to change a > little. Basically in the Dispatch we should be able to reuse > the Client > which contains all the message exchange logic - instead of > duplicating > it in Dispatch like we do now. > Hi Dan, I have created a system test for rest. At the moment the client in this rest test is using XML binding. I am working on adding a dispatcher client that is similar to the DispatchAddNumbersClient in JAX-WS RI. Not sure how this is related to what you mentioned above. Needless to say, this is just the first step we move towards a full rest support in cxf. I will have a sample added soon (based on jax-ws dispatch/provider approach), then we can discuss more on what we want to do next.
> > Pretty much like the provider based RESTful service in JAX-WS RI. > > For the provider based RESTful service, seems that there's > no need to > > get the tools support REST. Can you provide other use cases > which need > > tools support. > > WSDL 2 has an HTTP GET/PUT/POST/DELETE binding. This is the > usecase I'm > working toward. > > > I know the provider based RESTful service is just a small > start though. > > > I have some annotations & ideas I want to plan around with, so I'll > probably be doing some hacking here as well. > > Cheers, > - Dan > > > Thanks, > > James. > > > > Dan Diephouse 写道: > > > >> Has anyone started on refactoring the tooling to use the service > >> model yet? Guillaume and I were talking about chatting a bit about > >> WSDL2 & REST and I think it would be cool to add support > for it. Its > >> easy enough to start on the wsdl2->service model & service > model -> > >> wsdl2 conversions, but we still need the tooling support. > >> > >> If no one is doing anything with it, I may take a stab at > some of it > >> early next week. > >> Cheers, > >> - Dan > >> > > > > > -- > Dan Diephouse > (616) 971-2053 > Envoi Solutions LLC > http://netzooid.com > >
