Dan,
> >It looks like a very good plan. Just some concerns about item 6. > > > >[1] Now wsdl2java can generate ant build.xml for user. ASFAIK with > > code model it will take more effort to do this . > > I was just suggesting codemodel for use in gneerating java artifacts. > > >[2] If java2wsdl use the service model as mediate model to generate > > wsdl, service model also need to refactor to contain extra information > > for wsdl . > > I don't know of any such missing information - could you elaborate? Technically, we should be maintaining comments and annotations to be used for javadoc comments. I'm not sure if the current tools do that yet, but they could/should. However, this is a case where the usage of the ServiceModel by the tools is very different than the runtime. At runtime, we'd like to discard the comments and such as they would waste precious memory. Most likely, we'd need to a flag to the WSDLServiceBuilder to specify what information is discarded and what is set into the model. Enjoy! -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
