Re: How can I setup the configuration for management

[Jiang Ning]

Hi Andrea

Just a quick question about your latest commit which includes an 
management configuration.
  <bean id="org.apache.cxf.management.InstrumentationManager" 
abstract="true">
I checked abstract with the spring reference :
Is this bean "abstract", i.e. not meant to be instantiated itself but
rather just serving as parent for concrete child bean definitions. 



I can't tell which is the parent and which is child.

I got the example from spring reference CH3
<bean id="inheritedTestBeanWithoutClass" abstract="true">
   <property name="name" value="parent"/>
   <property name="age" value="1"/>
</bean>

<bean id="inheritsWithClass" class="org.springframework.beans.DerivedTestBean"
   parent="inheritedTestBeanWithoutClass" init-method="initialize">
 <property name="name" value="override"/>
 /<!-- age will inherit value of 1 from parent -->/
</bean> 

So org.apache.cxf.management.InstrumentationManager just the Templet bean. 
How can this bean value be set to InstrumentationManagerConfigBean?
What does the bean's id mean to InstrumentationManagerConfigBean which is really used in management?  


Thanks

Willem.



Andrea Smyth wrote:

Jiang Ning wrote:

Hi Andrea,

Thank you for your replay. Just one more question I want to ask,  
current  configuration Spring Beans provider getter ,setter method 
and can be set the value by Spring reading the configure xml, but If 
the Spring Beans values of complex types which are generated by JAXB 
not support this.


Hi Willem,

This is supported - see test case 
org.apache.cxf.configuraton.spring.JaxbPropertyEditorTest in 
cxf-common-utilities.
It's just that these complex types, or rather property editors for 
them,  have to be registered.
I'll commit a fix soon.

Cheers,
Andrea.


eg. If I just want to enable the JMS In the configuration, how can I 
just write the configuration like this.
 <bean class="org.apache.cxf.management.InstrumentationConfigBean">
    <property name="instrumentationControl">
        <value>
              <bean 
class="org.apache.cxf.management.InstrumentationType"> 
                                           <property name 
="jMXEnabled" value= "true"/>
              </bean>
        </value>
    </property>
</bean>

Thanks,
Willem.


Andrea Smyth wrote:

Hi Willem,

First I need to get the property editors for the non-standard types 
registered - I have created JIRA CXF-123 for this.
Second, you should update the contents of the value elements below 
to conform to the new (simplified)  instrumentation.xsd schema.
Will let you know when the CXF-123 is resolved.

Andrea.


Jiang Ning wrote:

Hi Adrea,
I had tried to use the new cxf configuration for  management. I 
can't make the xjc created class be set value by spring config xml.
Here is the Celtix style configuration to enable the JMX and setup 
the JMX Connetor's URL.
<bean class="org.apache.cxf.management.InstrumentationConfigBean">
     <property name="instrumentationControl">
         <value>
               <im:instrumentation>
                       
<im:InstrumentationEnabled>true</im:InstrumentationEnabled>
                       <im:JMXEnabled>true</im:JMXEnabled>
               </im:instrumentation>
         </value>
     </property>
     <property name="MBServer">
         <value>
            <im:MBServer>
               <im:JMXConnector>
                  <im:Threaded>true</im:Threaded>
                  <im:Daemon>false</im:Daemon>
                  
<im:JMXServiceURL>service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi/server</im:JMXServiceURL> 

                </im:JMXConnector>
             </im:MBServer>
         </value>
     </property>
 </bean>
Can you get me the example how can these complex value type can be 
set with the new CXF configuration.

Thanks,

Willem.