hi Dan, Thanks for your reply. Yes, for simple frontend, it's best way to create a EJBInvoker. Could we use EJBInvoker in JaxWS frontend approach? If it works, we can put away the dynamic proxy from both approach. Regards Unreal Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hiya,
Could you just create a different Invoker for the Service? In XFire we just created an EJB invoker (see http://xfire.codehaus.org/Invokers). The whole point of invokers are to allow different backend implementations of the service, so I would think there is something we can do there. - Dan Unreal Jiang wrote: >Hi guys, > > I'd like to port jca inbound into CXF from Celtix. In Celtix, we create a > dynamic proxy as a implementor, and this proxy will redirect the invocation > from client to a backend ejbBean. This way works fine in Celtix, bus doesn't > in CXF. Because in CXF JaxWS frontend implementation, it's requested that the > implementor must contain a WebSerivce or Provider annotation, in our case the > implementor is only a proxy, it doesn't have any annotations. > There have two ways to solve this issue, > 1. Use Simple frontend instead of JaxWS. > 2. Add a WebService annotation with binary code manipulation. > > Do you guys have any idea about this two approach? > Any comment will be appreciated. > > Regards > Unreal > > >--------------------------------- >Do you Yahoo!? > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail. > > -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2ยข/min or less.
