> * JAX-WS TCK and smaller details (we have a lot of JAX-WS done, we > just need to focus on the details now) Does Apache or anybody on CXF has access to JAX-WS TCK? It would be great to say how compliant we are with JAX-WS at each milestone.
-Adi > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Areas to get involved... > > Kevin Conner wrote: > > > Dan Diephouse wrote: > > > >> Was chatting with a few people here at ApacheCon and we came up with > >> the idea that we should have a page on how to get involved. So, I > >> went ahead and created one: > >> > >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Getting+Involved > >> > >> I only have a few ideas on there right now (I'm sure I'll think of > >> more later too), but hopefully others can contribute some ideas as > well! > > > > > > I was just composing an email about doing this :-). > > > Cool :-) > > > I went through the wiki/jira and didn't see much about longer term > > objectives, things are obviously focused on the M1 release. The wiki > > index page seems to cover a lot of areas and I wondered whether it > > would be a good idea to flesh some of them out. These could be added > > to the 'ideas' section on the above page. > > > Yes, I think it would be a good idea to flesh them out. Some of the high > level things I was thinking of M2: > > * JAX-WS TCK and smaller details (we have a lot of JAX-WS done, we > just need to focus on the details now) > * JBI integration > * WS-Security > * WS-RM > * Asynchronous HTTP support on client & server > * Refactor tooling to use service model > * WSDL 2 > > > It would also be helpful, to me at least, if there was some notion of > > priority attached to these items. Do people feel this is warranted? > > > Yup, good idea. > - Dan > > -- > Dan Diephouse > (616) 971-2053 > Envoi Solutions LLC > http://netzooid.com
