Hi Mike,

Try using jaxb customization in the schema of locator.wsdl to override
the default behaviour.
xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb";
<xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
       <jaxb:globalBindings mapSimpleTypeDef ="true"/>
     </xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>

Regards
Ajay

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Ma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 06 November 2006 03:51
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: locator.query.FilterType.setField() parameter type looks
wrong

Hi Mike ,

I think this is correct .  Conform to  JAXB2.0 specification(Proposed
Final
Draft September 30, 2005) section 6.2 ,  simple type will be mapped to
java
built in type , Object or List .

This case  is similar to the example on  JAXB2.0 sepc page 89 :

The following schema fragment:
<xs:complexType name="CTType">
<xs:attribute name="state" type="ZipOrName"/>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleTypename="ZipOrName" memberTypes="xs:integer xs:string"/>

is bound to the following Java representation.

public class CTType {
String getState() {...}
void setState(String value) {...}
}


Regards

Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramnarine, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: locator.query.FilterType.setField() parameter type looks
wrong
>
>
> Looking at:
>
>
>
testutils/target/generated/src/main/java/com/iona/ws/_2005/_11/locator/q
> uery/FilterType.java
>
> Which is generated from:
>
>    testutils/src/main/resources/wsdl/locator.wsdl
>
>
>
> The following method signature doesn't look right:
>
>     public void setField(String value) {
>
>
>
> Shouldn't it be:
>
>     public void setField(FilterFieldType value) {
>
>
>
> Here's the relevant wsdl:
>
>             <xs:complexType name="FilterType">
>
>                 <xs:simpleContent>
>
>                     <xs:extension base="xs:string">
>
>                         <xs:attribute name="field"
> type="tns:FilterFieldType"
>
>                             use="required"/>
>
>                     </xs:extension>
>
>                 </xs:simpleContent>
>
>             </xs:complexType>
>
>
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to