Thanks Willem.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Willem Jiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JMS setup > > Hi Eric > > I had commit the JMS endpoint config unit test with revision > 475593, please check it out. > You can also get the config snipit from > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/cxf/trunk/testutils/src > /main/resources/wsdl/jms_test_config.xml?view=markup&pathrev=475593 > > Thanks, > > Willem. > > Johnson, Eric wrote: > > >Willem, > >Could you send along a config snipit about how you would set > up a JMS > >endpoint using config? > >Cheers, > >Eric > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Willem Jiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:10 PM > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: JMS setup > >> > >>Hi Johnson, > >> > >>You are right, Currently JMS demos get the address info from WSDL > >>extensors. > >>Definitely we can setup the JMS port from configuration. > >>I will look into the code, maybe to I will write a demo for it. > >> > >>Willem. > >> > >>Johnson, Eric wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>I was looking through the JMS samples provided with the kit > >>> > >>> > >>and noticed > >> > >> > >>>that all of the ports are set up using the WSDL extensors. > Is there > >>>still a way to use configuration to set up a JMS port? > >>>In Celtix configuration was pushed as the preferred method > >>> > >>> > >>of setting > >> > >> > >>>up a JMS port. Is that no longer the case? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
