[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Moesel updated CXF-606:
-----------------------------

    Attachment: mtom_boundary_bug.patch

Previously mentioned patch (in description).

> MTOM Broken with Axis2 and .NET clients
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-606
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Chris Moesel
>         Attachments: mtom_boundary_bug.patch
>
>
> A recent change to AttachmentDeserializer broke MTOM compatibility with Axis2 
> and C# .NET clients.  The AttachmentDeserializer no longer looks in 
> Content-Type to get the boundary delimiters-- instead it looks in the message 
> content input stream.  The problem is, it now assumes that boundary 
> delimiters will start with "----=_Part_".  This is not the case for Apache 
> Axis2 or C# clients, so it can't find the boundary delimiters.
> Axis2 uses boundary delimiters like: 
> MIMEBoundaryurn_uuid_6BC4984D5D38EB283C1177616488109
> .NET uses boundary delimiters like: --MIMEBoundary633131968239902899
> I am attaching a patch.  The patch changes AttachmentDeserializer to first 
> look in the Content-Type for the boundary.  If it's found, then it uses it.  
> If not, only then does it look in the message content input stream.  When 
> looking in the message content, it does, however, still assume the boundary 
> delimiter starts with "----=_Part_".  I'm not currently familiar enough with 
> boundary delimiter rules to write a better boundary detection scheme.  
> Nonetheless, this patch should make handling attachments more efficient 
> (since it doesn't always copy out the message content InputStream).  And, of 
> course, it fixes the Axis2 and C# errors too!
> A unit test is also included so this bug will never happen again. =)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to