[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536262
]
Daniel Kulp commented on CXF-1123:
----------------------------------
However, the WS-BP also specifically says: (section 4.4.2)
R2205 A wsdl:binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST refer, in each of its
soapbind:header, soapbind:headerfault and soapbind:fault elements, only to
wsdl:part element(s) that have been defined using the element attribute.
and:
Because faults and headers do not contain parameters, soapbind:fault,
soapbind:header and soapbind:headerfault assume, per WSDL 1.1, that the value
of the style attribute is "document". R2204 requires that all wsdl:part
elements with a style attribute whose value is "document" that are bound to
soapbind:body be defined using the element attribute. This requirement does the
same for soapbind:fault, soapbind:header and soapbind:headerfault elements.
Thus, Faults (and headers, BTW) are always in Doc/Literal form and thus should
be properly qualified. The RPC/Lit rules do not come into play for the
Faults.
That all said, is there a specific test or wsdl or service or something that is
not working due to this? If there is a service not sending faults back
properly qualified, that would be a bug in that service.
> ClientFaultConverter needs to deal with unqualified part names.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1123
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2
> Reporter: Jose Garcia-Sacristan
> Fix For: 2.0.3
>
>
> WSI-BP states that RPC/Lit part accessors should be completely unqualified.
> ClientFaultConverter needs to support this.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
