Are these components stable enough for use? Can we use them with Servicemix 3.1 or would I need to move to 3.2 (I'm not sure how stable that is either). We really aren't using servicemix for anything other than a container to hold 3 webservices right now, so if it only supported basic functionality we'd most likely be fine. I was hoping to take advantage of some of the CXF features if possible at this point.
On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are working on a better integration between ServiceMix and CXF. I > would encourage you to check the new ServiceMix components that we > are working on as they will leverage all CXF features. These are > servicemix-cxf-bc and servicemix-cxf-se. Unfortunately, they are not > documented yet, so I would advise you to look at the junit tests to > see how it works. Basically, servicemix-cxf-se is a replacement of > servicemix-jsr181 using CXF, and servicemix-cxf-bc is a replacement > of servicemix-http using CXF. > These components are available at: > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ > servicemix/servicemix-cxf-bc/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/ > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ > servicemix/servicemix-cxf-se/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/ > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > On Aug 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote: > > > Hi, I decided to give CFX a try and upgrade from our XFire > > codebase. I'm > > wondering though, is CFX compatible with Servicemix 3.1? If so, > > how do you > > integrate it? I thought I saw somewhere it was. I did attempt to > > use CFX > > from within Servicemix, but the Jetty server that normally would start > > doesn't start, so I'm missing something with CFX. Or is this more > > of a > > servicemix question? > > > > Thanks! > >
