Thganks.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:48 PM > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Soap version > > Oops, that's not the snail. It's called @BindingType. > > Look here: > http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071102#NWSstep6 > > @BindingType(value=javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_MT > OM_BINDING) > > Glen > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:45 -0500 schrieb Glen Mazza: > > OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway. > > > > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING > > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING > > > > Glen > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies: > > > Glen, > > > > > > Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I > > > don't have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now? > > > > > > --benson > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM > > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: Soap version > > > > > > > > Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. > > > > I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which > > > > specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to > > > > rely on a config file for MTOM instead. > > > > > > > > Glen > > > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb > Benson Margulies: > > > > > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 > > > > for JAX-WS > > > > > services? > > > > > > > > > > > >