Thganks. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:48 PM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Soap version
> 
> Oops, that's not the snail.  It's called @BindingType.
> 
> Look here:
> http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071102#NWSstep6
> 
> @BindingType(value=javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_MT
> OM_BINDING)
> 
> Glen
> 
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:45 -0500 schrieb Glen Mazza:
> > OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway.
> > 
> > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING
> > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING
> > 
> > Glen
> > 
> > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > > Glen,
> > > 
> > > Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I 
> > > don't have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now?
> > > 
> > > --benson
> > >  
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM
> > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Soap version
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. 
> > > >  I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which 
> > > > specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to 
> > > > rely on a config file for MTOM instead.
> > > > 
> > > > Glen
> > > > 
> > > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb 
> Benson Margulies:
> > > > > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2
> > > > for JAX-WS
> > > > > services?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to