On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 13:05 -0500, Frederick N. Brier wrote: > I reread my own posting and realized that the problem is not in the > detail element, but in the <faultcode> element which contains an > arbitrary string, "ServerFaultCode", not a QName. The exception says: > > "No NamespaceURI, SOAP requires faultcode content to be a QName" > > I believe the faultcode element and QName requirement was introduced > with SOAP 1.1. Can CXF be forced to validate using SOAP 1.0? If so, > how? What are the ramifications? I checked the schemas specified in > the WSDL document and they appear to be SOAP 1.0. Why didn't CXF > automatically use same SOAP 1.0 schemas as were defined in the WSDL > document?
The errors comes out of the SAAJ component, doesn't it?
