ClientFaultConverter and schema extension

[Frederick N. Brier]

I thought it was yet another problem with the web service not declaring 
a SOAP fault on an operation, but now I am not sure.  The SOAP operation 
listed a Fault that was of a base type of the fault that was thrown.  
When ClientFaultConverter iterated over the operation's listed faults it 
did not match.  So it threw a generic SoapFault.  So what does SOAP 1.1 
standard say?  Should a WSDL list each fault even if they are extensions 
of some base element?  Or should listing a base element as the fault be 
acceptable, inheriting not just form, but function?  If the latter, then 
ClientFaultConverter would need to be amended in some fashion.  Thank 
you for any insight on this.

Fred