> On Mar 6, 2015, at 4:49 PM, David Vandevoorde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
[…]
>>
>> I see three ways out: extend 1590 to also include this "volatile members
>> don't count" clause, or allow a constructor to make an additional copy of a
>> parameter object in all cases of copy-initialization, or revert the
>> resolution of 496.
>>
>> Reverting 496 seems most palatable to me right now, but in any case this
>> seems like something for CWG to decide rather than something for us to work
>> around in the ABI.
>
>
> Agreed.
I've asked Mike Miller (CWG chair) to open an issue about that.
Daveed
_______________________________________________
cxx-abi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
