> On May 5, 2015, at 6:17 PM, Jason Merrill <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/05/2015 05:31 PM, John McCall wrote: >> These qualifiers aren’t order-sensitive, so we need to specify the order; >> alphabetical order is the most obvious, which I think would make this >> mangling U11regparmLi3EU7stdcallFviiE rather than the other way around. > >> For member pointer types, this would become part of the member type. That’s >> also where we put ref-qualifiers and CV-qualifiers, so we need to specify an >> order; I suggest putting these attributes after the CV/ref qualifiers. > > I was working from the passage in the ABI that says, "In cases where multiple > order-insensitive qualifiers are present, they should be ordered 'K' (closest > to the base type), 'V', 'r', and 'U' (farthest from the base type), with the > 'U' qualifiers in alphabetical order by the vendor name (with alphabetically > earlier names closer to the base type)." > > So I think reverse alphabetical order before the CV-qualifiers is what we > want.
Oh, yes, I’d forgotten we’d specified it that way, makes sense. John. _______________________________________________ cxx-abi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
