Lame is more like the word, they hurt the business more than help in my opinion

for example, I own both games so why I cant have a computer version shared by 
someone who plays is beyond me

Steve
________________________________
________________________________
Quality & Experience in Scuba
http://www.scubasuppliers.com
________________________________
________________________________
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [CBML] Avalanche Press 3rd Reich



  Antonio,

  Good Luck.? Avalanche does not support Cyberboard, nor allow anyone to 
"officially" build cyberboard gameboxes of their games.? It?has been rumored 
that they will take legal action against anyone found building one.

  That said, you may get lucky and find someone who has built one, but it is 
unlikely.? If you decide to build one yourself for your own use, I wouldn't 
publicize it.

  Avalanche Press is funny that way.

  Jim?

  -----Original Message-----
  From: antonio.cammaroto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 6:43 am
  Subject: [CBML] Avalanche Press 3rd Reich

  Hy guys,

  I am Antonio Cammaroto, a wargamer since eighties but a new member of 
  this group.

  I am looking for the gamebox of the Avalanche Press version of Third 
  Reich. It was not possible to find it in the web and I asked also to 
  Avalanche but they didn't answer me.

  Can you help me to find it (if avalaible somewhere)?

  Thanks in advance.

  Antonio

  __________________________________________________________
  Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
http://mail.aol.com

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.2/967 - Release Date: 8/22/2007 
6:51 PM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to