The configure flags for the package perhaps. I thought that having /usr/doc/Cygwin/foo-readme was standard for binary packages - see this thread (Started by you :])
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-06/msg00021.html Rob === ----- Original Message ----- From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:41 PM Subject: Re: Robots binary package > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 04:56:19PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > Is missing /usr/doc/Cygwin/Robots-2.0.1.README. > > > > Is that intentional? > > Yes. What do you want to read? > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Red Hat, Inc. >
