"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > Corinna, > > 2002-01-09 12:50:02, du schriebst: > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: > >> Users may have to include /usr/libexec to their PATH, due to the fact > >> that libhttpd.dll resides there. Should we move at least that core > >> library to /usr/bin to have it in PATH like the other cygfoo.dlls? > > > Shouldn't that be /usr/bin/cyghttpd.dll? > > ^^^ > > It is the same like it is with perl or python. These packages > doesn't use libtool and to change the name would need some additional > patches in a lot of build related files which would blow up the patch.
yep, Gerrit is right here. I may change it if absolutely required, but it has to be patched in the Makefile.tmpl's and the main src/Configure script. Is it _absolutely_ required? setup.html does not state it, IMO?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are