Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Ah, ok. I don't think this is of much importance, but > cygwin.com/setup.html says: > > * In your binary package, include a file > /usr/doc/Cygwin/foo-vendor-suffix.README > > Before I went there to check, I tried to look if there was a > convention for this, but strangely enough, none of the packages I > checked had a usr/doc/Cygwin at all (cygwin, bash, gawk, textutils, > ed)?. Most of the packages you listed pre-date the /usr/doc/Cygwin requirement. In an ideal world, the next release of each would then follow this new requirement -- but this isn't an ideal world. :-P *New* packages, however, should follow this convention -- and tetex probably should, as well, even though it isn't exactly new. Whgy? Because from this outsider's perspective, it sure seems like tetex needs lots of tweaking and TLC to build on Cygwin -- and those tweaks should be documented... --Chuck