> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Note: libtool-devel does not use auto-image-base. I don't THINK > libtool-stable does, either. And all of "my" DLLs have been rebuilt > over the last several months without auto-image-base. Just FYI. I know :}. I was quite active in the discussion that led to that status quo. IFF cygwin1.dll becomes non-relocatable || all cygwin1 linked dlls and modules get rebased correctly, then auto-image-base is allowed again (although with rebasing, it's kinda pointless :}). > Also, there was some code passed back and forth a while ago > (Rob, yours > maybe?) that purported to add a "non-relocatable" option to > binutils. Not mine, I was looking for such though. Rob
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Christopher Faylor
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Robert Collins
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Christopher Faylor
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Charles Wilson
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Christopher Faylor
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler
- RE: setup.exe rebase patch Robert Collins
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Charles Wilson
- RE: setup.exe rebase patch Robert Collins
- RE: setup.exe rebase patch Robert Collins
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler
- RE: setup.exe rebase patch Robert Collins
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler
- RE: setup.exe rebase patch Robert Collins
- Re: setup.exe rebase patch Jason Tishler