> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: strange source packaging? > > > Charles Wilson wrote: > > > > Actually, if there's no opposition (hah!) I'll update the > > documentation to reflect the current situation (e.g. 3 > styles) -- but > > I'd like to mark one of them as the preferred style for new > packages. > > Hopefully mine and robert's style. ;-) > > > Okay, as promised: documentation. If you don't want to unpack the > tarball and look at it, go here: > Can we get a diff for the HTML page? Rob
- Re: strange source packaging? Christopher Faylor
- Re: strange source packaging? Earnie Boyd
- Re: strange source packaging? Charles Wilson
- Re: strange source packaging? Charles Wilson
- RE: strange source packaging? Robert Collins
- RE: strange source packaging? Robert Collins
- Re: strange source packaging? Charles Wilson
- Re: strange source packaging? Earnie Boyd
- RE: strange source packaging? Robert Collins
- RE: strange source packaging? Robert Collins
- Re: strange source packaging? Robert Collins
- Re: strange source packaging? Charles Wilson
- Re: strange source packaging? Robert Collins
- Re: strange source packaging? Charles Wilson
- RE: strange source packaging? Robert Collins