> -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 10:23 AM > To: Robert Collins; Charles Wilson > Cc: Kde-Cygwin; Binutils; Cygwin-Apps > Subject: RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld > > > > The PE spec (as I read it) indicates that as long as a name is > > included (ie it's not link-only-by-ordinal) then ordinals > can change > > and nothing will break. > > > > It's only when the only link information is the ordinal > that problems > > will appear. > > Or ld has a switch to explicit use ordinals (see other mails from me) I don't see what such a switch gains. The hint ordinal should provide the same performance as an ordinal-only-link. Rob
- Re: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Charles Wilson
- Re: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Charles Wilson
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- Re: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Charles Wilson
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker