> -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 4:28 AM > > > > Hangon, lets go back a bit. Why do you want ordinal-only > linking? For > > runtime or link-time performance? Or for on-disk import > library size? > > Or.... > runtime performance Ok, well then check this : http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/0500/hood/hood0500.asp article out. Linking by ordinal only gives a 2%-4% improvement. rebinding and rebasing gives up to 18%. So linking by ordinal only will help you a little. rebinding and rebasing your .dll's will help much much more. And infact, rebasing and rebinding makes the INT obsolete - because the IAT is precalculated, so you can't get 22% by linking by ordinal and rebinding and rebasing. Rob
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- Re: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Robert Collins
- RE: ordinal linking for cygwin ld Ralf Habacker