Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Packaging looks okay to me. For later releases, you might think about >>re-enabling the libtool shared library support. But for now, the static >>lib is great. >> > > Could you upload the package, Charles? Well, I said *packaging* looks okay. However, I object to the setup.hint: category: Devel requires: sdesc: "the GNU Scientific Library" ldesc: "the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical routines for scientific computing." This is not a development tool. It's a library. The category should be Libs. And, it's a binary not a script, so it requires cygwin. If Teun makes those changes, then sure, I'll upload... --Chuck
